Consider the class foo
with two constructors defined like this:
class foo
{
public:
foo(const std::string& filename) {std::cout << "ctor 1" << std::endl;}
foo(const bool some_flag = false) {std::cout << "ctor 2" << std::endl;}
};
Instantiate the class with a string literal, and guess which constructor is called?
foo a ("/path/to/file");
Output:
ctor 2
I don't know about you, but I don't find that the most intuitive behavior in programming history. I bet there is some clever reason for it, though, and I'd like to know what that might be?
Implicit Type Conversion is also known as 'automatic type conversion'. It is done by the compiler on its own, without any external trigger from the user. It generally takes place when in an expression more than one data type is present.
An implicit conversion sequence is the sequence of conversions required to convert an argument in a function call to the type of the corresponding parameter in a function declaration. The compiler tries to determine an implicit conversion sequence for each argument.
Everyone knows Implicit Conversion is bad. It can ruin SARGability, defeat index usage, and burn up your CPU like it needs some Valtrex.
In Implicit type conversion, Python automatically converts one data type to another data type. This process doesn't need any user involvement. Let's see an example where Python promotes the conversion of the lower data type (integer) to the higher data type (float) to avoid data loss.
It's very common in C to write this
void f(T* ptr) {
if (ptr) {
// ptr is not NULL
}
}
You should make a const char*
constructor.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With