Why is the new JavaScript module request synchronous? Is it supposed to be only used in a job queue?
Is there any way to make asynchronous http(s) requests in ArangoDB?
Full disclosure: I'm part of ArangoDB's development team and primarily work on Foxx and everything JavaScript. I'm also the guy who wrote the org/arangodb/request
module.
ArangoDB is a different environment than Node.js, despite sharing many similarities (such as using the V8 JavaScript engine). Unlike Node.js (or the browser), ArangoDB uses a thread-based concurrency model and doesn't feature an Event Loop. However the threads are not exposed in JavaScript (and in fact in V8 every thread is fully isolated) so you normally don't even have to think of them.
In the browser and in Node.js functions like setTimeout
work by delaying code execution via the Event Loop (until a certain amount of time has passed or until an external event has occurred).
In ArangoDB the code is always executed linearly. For example, incoming HTTP requests are passed to Foxx controllers in JavaScript and the response is sent as soon as the controller returns. Even if you could use setTimeout
, the external resources you were working with (or even "internal" ones like the document collections and transactions) would likely be already gone by the time the delayed code could execute.
Because of this, the request
function provided by the org/arangodb/request
module is also entirely synchronous. Instead of returning a promise or taking a callback it directly returns the incoming response data. It is also decidedly not the same module as request
on npm but rather a synchronous implementation based on that module's API to the extent that implementing its API is possible outside Node.js (e.g. not including streams and returning the remote response instead of taking callbacks).
If you come from a Node.js/io.js background, this may feel wrong because non-blocking IO can achieve higher throughput, but keep in mind that the design goals of ArangoDB and Node.js are very different. Node.js is built around streams and network connections. ArangoDB is built as a persistent data storage and has to deal with transactions and locks instead.
It is probably not the best idea to access external APIs directly from your Foxx controllers if you have a high likelihood of serious network latency or if the external API's response is not essential to the client response. This is what the Foxx queues are for. Transactional e-mails are a prime example for this.
While Foxx is very versatile, its primary focus is to allow you to move most of your application (especially logic that benefits from running closer to the data) directly into the database. For small to medium scale projects that, you can probably get away with doing external API calls in-bounds. But if your application is primarily concerned with talking to other services over the network, running that code in a database is probably not the optimal solution.
Luckily ArangoDB plays well with others, so it's easy to move your network-intensive code out of Foxx if you find that it becomes a performance bottleneck at higher loads. Foxx doesn't eliminate the need for application servers, but it can considerably reduce their complexity.
As a correction to Brian's answer: sadly promises won't let you write async code in a synchronous environment either. The Promises/A+ spec defines promises as having to be executed asynchronously. Where they aren't natively supported they still have to be built on top of existing functions like setTimeout
or process.nextTick
, neither of which ArangoDB implements.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With