Follow up question to a previous question, this has been identified as a co-variance issue. Taking this one step further, if I modify IFactory
as follows:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
IFactory<IProduct> factory = new Factory();
}
}
class Factory : IFactory<Product>
{
}
class Product : IProduct
{
}
interface IFactory<out T> where T : IProduct
{
List<T> MakeStuff();
}
interface IProduct
{
}
I get:
Invalid variance: The type parameter T must be invariantly valid on Sandbox.IFactory.MakeStuff(). T is covariant.
Why is this not invariantly valid? How can/should this be resolved?
The other answers are correct but it is instructive to reason out why the compiler flags this as unsafe. Suppose we allowed it; what could go wrong?
class Sprocket: Product {}
class Gadget : Product {}
class GadgetFactory : IFactory<Gadget>
{
public List<Gadget> MakeStuff()
{
return new List<Gadget>() { new Gadget(); }
}
}
... later ...
IFactory<Gadget> gf = new GadgetFactory();
IFactory<Product> pf = gf; // Covariant!
List<Product> pl = pf.MakeStuff(); // Actually a list of gadgets
pl.Add(new Sprocket());
and hey, we just added a sprocket to a list that can only contain gadgets.
There is only one place where the compiler can detect the problem, and that's in the declaration of the interface.
Sorry about the somewhat excessively jargonish error message. I couldn't come up with anything better.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With