Why is initialization of integer member variable (which is not const static) not allowed in C++?

Question

My C++ compiler complains when i try to initialize a int member variable in class definition. It tells "only static const integral data members can be initialized within a class". Can you please explain the rationale behind this restriction (if possible with example).

Answer 1

Because it's not allowed in the current standard. According to Bjarne, you will be able to do this in C++0x. If you really need it, try setting the compiler to C++0x (-std=c++0x in GCC) and see if your compiler supports it.

Answer 2

The rationale is the "low-level" nature of C++. If it would allow this, the compiler would need to generate initialization code for all constructors which is not entirely clear to the developer.

After all it might be necessary to initialize members of base classes on the construction of a derived class even when the base class constructors are not explicitly invoked.

Static const integral variables do not need intitalization upon object creation.

Answer 3

The static restriction exists because C++ uses constructor initializers to initialize non-static data members:

struct Example {
  int n;
  Example() : n(42) {}
};

The const restriction exists because the const case is treated specially (rather than the other way around) so that static const integral members can usually be treated as if they had internal linkage, similar to const variables at namespace scope (C++03 §7.1.5.1p2, if you're interested). This is primarily beneficial to use the members in integral constant expressions, such as array sizes.