Why is Graphics.MeasureString() returning a higher than expected number?

Question

I'm generating a receipt and am using the Graphics object to call the DrawString method to print out the required text.

graphics.DrawString(string, font, brush, widthOfPage / 2F, yPoint, stringformat); 

This works fine for what I needed it to do. I always knew what I was printing out, so I could manually trim any strings so it would fit properly on 80mm receipt paper. Then I had to add an extra bit of functionality that would make this more flexible. The user could pass in strings that would be added to the bottom.

Since I didn't know what they were going to put, I just created my own word wrap function that takes in a number of characters to wrap at and the string itself. In order to find out the number of characters, I was doing something like this:

float width = document.DefaultPageSettings.PrintableArea.Width; int max = (int)(width / graphics.MeasureString("a", font).Width); 

Now the width is returning me 283, which in mm is about 72, which makes sense when you account for margins on 80mm paper.

But the MeasureString method is returning 10.5 on a Courier New 8pt font. So instead of getting around what I expected to be 36 - 40, I'm getting 26, resulting in 2 lines of text being turned into 3-4.

The units for PrintableArea.Width are 1/100th of an inch, and the PageUnit for the graphics object is Display (which says is typically 1/100th of an inch for printers). So why am I only getting 26 back?

Answer 1

From WindowsClient.net:

GDI+ adds a small amount (1/6 em) to each end of every string displayed. This 1/6 em allows for glyphs with overhanging ends (such as italic 'f'), and also gives GDI+ a small amount of leeway to help with grid fitting expansion.

The default action of DrawString will work against you in displaying adjacent runs:

• Firstly the default StringFormat adds an extra 1/6 em at each end of each output;
• Secondly, when grid fitted widths are less than designed, the string is allowed to contract by up to an em.

To avoid these problems:

• Always pass MeasureString and DrawString a StringFormat based on the typographic StringFormat (GenericTypographic).
  Set the Graphics TextRenderingHint to TextRenderingHintAntiAlias. This rendering method uses anti-aliasing and sub-pixel glyph positioning to avoid the need for grid-fitting, and is thus inherently resolution independent.

---

There are two ways of drawing text in .NET:

• GDI+ (graphics.MeasureString and graphics.DrawString)
• GDI (TextRenderer.MeasureText and TextRenderer.DrawText)

From Michael Kaplan's (rip) excellent blog Sorting It All Out, In .NET 1.1 everything used GDI+ for text rendering. But there were some problems:

• There are some performance issues caused by the somewhat stateless nature of GDI+, where device contexts would be set and then the original restored after each call.
• The shaping engines for international text have been updated many times for Windows/Uniscribe and for Avalon (Windows Presentation Foundation), but have not been updated for GDI+, which causes international rendering support for new languages to not have the same level of quality.

So they knew they wanted to change the .NET framework to stop using GDI+'s text rendering system, and use GDI. At first they hoped they could simply change:

graphics.DrawString 

to call the old DrawText API instead of GDI+. But they couldn't make the text-wrapping and spacing match exactly as what GDI+ did. So they were forced to keep graphics.DrawString to call GDI+ (compatiblity reasons; people who were calling graphics.DrawString would suddenly find that their text didn't wrap the way it used to).

A new static TextRenderer class was created to wrap GDI text rendering. It has two methods:

TextRenderer.MeasureText TextRenderer.DrawText 

Note: TextRenderer is a wrapper around GDI, while graphics.DrawString is still a wrapper around GDI+.

---

Then there was the issue of what to do with all the existing .NET controls, e.g.:

• Label
• Button
• TextBox

They wanted to switch them over to use TextRenderer (i.e. GDI), but they had to be careful. There might be people who depended on their controls drawing like they did in .NET 1.1. And so was born "compatible text rendering".

By default controls in application behave like they did in .NET 1.1 (they are "compatible").

You turn off compatibility mode by calling:

Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false); 

This makes your application better, faster, with better international support. To sum up:

SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(true)  SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false) =======================================  ========================================  default                                  opt-in  bad                                      good  the one we don't want to use             the one we want to use  uses GDI+ for text rendering             uses GDI for text rendering  graphics.MeasureString                   TextRenderer.MeasureText  graphics.DrawString                      TextRenderer.DrawText  Behaves same as 1.1                      Behaves *similar* to 1.1                                           Looks better                                           Localizes better                                           Faster 

---

It's also useful to note the mapping between GDI+ TextRenderingHint and the corresponding LOGFONT Quality used for GDI font drawing:

TextRenderingHint           mapped by TextRenderer to LOGFONT quality ========================    ========================================================= ClearTypeGridFit            CLEARTYPE_QUALITY (5) (Windows XP: CLEARTYPE_NATURAL (6)) AntiAliasGridFit            ANTIALIASED_QUALITY (4) AntiAlias                   ANTIALIASED_QUALITY (4) SingleBitPerPixelGridFit    PROOF_QUALITY (2) SingleBitPerPixel           DRAFT_QUALITY (1) else (e.g.SystemDefault)    DEFAULT_QUALITY (0) 

---

Samples

Here's some comparisons of GDI+ (graphics.DrawString) verses GDI (TextRenderer.DrawText) text rendering:

GDI+: TextRenderingHintClearTypeGridFit, GDI: CLEARTYPE_QUALITY:

GDI+: TextRenderingHintAntiAlias, GDI: ANTIALIASED_QUALITY:

GDI+: TextRenderingHintAntiAliasGridFit, GDI: not supported, uses ANTIALIASED_QUALITY:

GDI+: TextRenderingHintSingleBitPerPixelGridFit, GDI: PROOF_QUALITY:

GDI+: TextRenderingHintSingleBitPerPixel, GDI: DRAFT_QUALITY:

i find it odd that DRAFT_QUALITY is identical to PROOF_QUALITY, which is identical to CLEARTYPE_QUALITY.

See also

• UseCompatibleTextRendering - Compatible with whaaaaaat?
• Sorting it all out: A quick look at Whidbey's TextRenderer
• MSDN: LOGFONT Structure
• AppCompat Guy: GDI vs. GDI+ Text Rendering Performance
• GDI+ Text, Resolution Independence, and Rendering Methods. Or - Why does my text look different in GDI+ and in GDI?