I'm trying to insert some data from a XML document into a variable table. What blows my mind is that the same select-into (bulk) runs in no time while insert-select takes ages and holds SQL server process accountable for 100% CPU usage while the query executes.
I took a look at the execution plan and INDEED there's a difference. The insert-select adds an extra "Table spool" node even though it doesn't assign cost. The "Table Valued Function [XML Reader]" then gets 92%. With select-into, the two "Table Valued Function [XML Reader]" get 49% each.
Please explain "WHY is this happening" and "HOW to resolve this (elegantly)" as I can indeed bulk insert into a temporary table and then in turn insert into variable table, but that's just creepy.
I tried this on SQL 10.50.1600, 10.00.2531 with the same results
Here's a test case:
declare @xColumns xml
declare @columns table(name nvarchar(300))
if OBJECT_ID('tempdb.dbo.#columns') is not null drop table #columns
insert @columns select name from sys.all_columns
set @xColumns = (select name from @columns for xml path('columns'))
delete @columns
print 'XML data size: ' + cast(datalength(@xColumns) as varchar(30))
--raiserror('selecting', 10, 1) with nowait
--select ColumnNames.value('.', 'nvarchar(300)') name
--from @xColumns.nodes('/columns/name') T1(ColumnNames)
raiserror('selecting into #columns', 10, 1) with nowait
select ColumnNames.value('.', 'nvarchar(300)') name
into #columns
from @xColumns.nodes('/columns/name') T1(ColumnNames)
raiserror('inserting @columns', 10, 1) with nowait
insert @columns
select ColumnNames.value('.', 'nvarchar(300)') name
from @xColumns.nodes('/columns/name') T1(ColumnNames)
Thanks a bunch!!
This is a bug in SQL Server 2008. Use
insert @columns
select ColumnNames.value('.', 'nvarchar(300)') name
from @xColumns.nodes('/columns/name') T1(ColumnNames)
OPTION (OPTIMIZE FOR ( @xColumns = NULL ))
This workaround is from an item on the Microsoft Connect Site which also mentions a hotfix for this Eager Spool / XML Reader issue is available (under traceflag 4130).
The reason for the performance regression is explained in a different connect item
The spool was introduced due to a general halloween protection logic (that is not needed for the XQuery expressions).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With