It looks like that Hibernate started using LONG
data type in version 3.5.5 (we upgraded from 3.2.7) instead of CLOB
for the property of type="text"
.
This is causing problems as LONG
data type in Oracle is an old outdated data type (see http://www.orafaq.com/wiki/LONG) that shouldn’t be used, and tables can’t have more than one column having LONG
as a data type.
Does anyone know why this has been changed?
I have tried to set the Oracle SetBigStringTryClob
property to true (as suggested in Hibernate > CLOB > Oracle :(), but that does not affect the data type mapping but only data transfer internals which are irrelevant to my case.
One possible fix for this is to override the org.hibernate.dialect.Oracle9iDialect
:
public class Oracle9iDialectFix extends Oracle9iDialect {
public Oracle9iDialectFix() {
super();
registerColumnType(Types.LONGVARCHAR, "clob");
registerColumnType(Types.LONGNVARCHAR, "clob");
}
}
However this is the last resort - overriding this class is step closer to forking Hibernate which I would rather avoid doing.
Can anybody explain why this was done? Should this be raised as a bug?
[UPDATE]: I have created https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-5569, let's see what happens.
It looks like the resolution to this issue is to use materialized_clob
, at least that's what's being said by Gail Badner on HHH-5569.
This doesn't help me at all (and I left relevant comment about that) but might be helpful for someone else here. Anyway the bug is rejected and there is very little I can do about it but use overriden dialect :(
Can anybody explain why this was done? Should this be raised as a bug?
This has been done for HHH-3892 - Improve support for mapping SQL LONGVARCHAR and CLOB to Java String, SQL LONGVARBINARY and BLOB to Java byte[] (update of the documentation is tracked by HHH-4878).
And according to the same issue, the old behavior was wrong.
(NOTE: currently, org.hibernate.type.TextType incorrectly maps "text" to java.sql.Types.CLOB; this will be fixed by this issue and updated in database dialects)
You can always raise an issue but in short, my understanding is that you should use type="clob"
if you want to get the property mapped to a CLOB
.
PS: Providing your own Dialect
and declaring it in your Hibernate configuration (which has nothing to do with a fork) is IMHO not a solution on the long term.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With