Why don't more people use emacs with viper-mode? [closed]

Question

I've started to use emacs, and I've found out that while the editor-specific features of emacs are better than those of vi, the text-manipulation methods of vi are better than those of emacs (and easier on your control-pinky!).

It seems that viper-mode, a marriage of the two best parts of each editor, is the ideal solution for someone that wants a complete editor.

But before I start investing my time learning the vi commands in the emacs environment, I'd like to know why it doesn't seem like many people use viper-mode. Is there something I'll find out after using it a while that will cause me to switch to plain emacs or vi?

Answer 1

Because you are either a vi person or an emacs person. The same way you're either a dog person or a cat person.

On a more serious note, why would I change? vi offers me all the power I need and I'm pretty certain the emacs people would feel the same way about their editor of choice.

I've used vi for over twenty years and some of its features still surprise me (admittedly, it's usually vim rather than vi nowadays). I don't want to dedicate the next twenty years of my life at becoming adept with emacs. There's no benefit and plenty of cost, and pretty much all of my non-minor decisions are subject to cost/benefit analyses.

Mostly, it comes down to what you're comfortable with. It took years for me to stop trying to use the WordStar 3.3 CTRL-K CTRL-X key sequence to exit from most editors. It had burnt itself into my spinal cord so that all the brain had to do was issue an exit command and the lowest levels of the nervous system would take over.

And, anyway, emacs with its strange command sequence like

CTRL META LEFTSHIFT RIGHTSHIFT WINDOWS OPENAPPLE ALT K

is better suited to aliens with 87 fingers, or elite pianists :-)