Why doesn't Qt use exception handling?

Question

I have always wondered that since Qt uses almost every C++ feature in the standard and in a wonderful and an innovative way, and whenever it doesn't use a particular feature, it has a perfectly valid and applicable reason for not doing so. In that case, why is it that no Qt classes ever use the throw keyword and throw any exceptions? What is their rationale behind never requiring a try ... catch block in our Qt written code?

Personally, I myself don't like it much and never use it whether or not I'm working with Qt and always go with error codes and return values instead of throwing exception objects. But why don't I see a QException class in their documentation? What is the Qt developers viewpoint on this?

Answer 1

For historic reasons, mostly. Exception support in compilers took quite some time to mature. Citing Nokia's Tobias Hunger:

"When Qt was started exceptions were not available for all the compilers that needed to be supported by Qt. Today we are trying to keep the APIs consistent, so modules that have a history of not using exceptions will generally not get new code using exceptions added. You will notice exceptions are used in some of the new modules of Qt."

I think that sums it up pretty much.

Answer 2

If you google for "qt exceptions" you will get lot of discussions about this topic. Here is an "official" answer:

When Qt was started exceptions were not available for all the compilers that needed to be supported by Qt. Today we are trying to keep the APIs consistent, so modules that have a history of not using exceptions will generally not get new code using exceptions added.

You will notice exceptions are used in some of the new modules of Qt.

If you look for exception in the index of assistant (i.e. in the Qt documentation) you will find some exception classes, e.g. QtConcurrent::Exception.