Or, to be more specific: Can't I just use private methods instead?
As I understand Thor it features ways to mark methods as no tasks because the concept of a method being a task is different from the concept of a method's visibility. They need to be differentiated because they do different jobs.
Every method (independently of its visibility) of a subclass to the class Thor
is considered a task unless it is explicitly marked as no task. By controlling the visibility of a task you control access to that task, e.g. if you make a task private it cannot be called by subclasses or directly by a user. Access control is different from whether something is a task or not. Methods that are not tasks cannot be called directly by Thor and they cannot have options.
Here is an example to illustrate. In the following SuperClass
inherits the task baseTask
and the method this_is_not_a_task
from BaseClass
. Note that if the task baseTask
is marked as private it will not be inherited by SuperClass
but this_is_not_a_task
will still be inherited.
require 'thor'
class BaseClass < Thor
method_options :force => :boolean, :alias => :string
desc 'baseTask', 'Base task'
def baseTask
puts this_is_not_a_task("base")
end
no_tasks do
def this_is_not_a_task(s)
s.upcase
end
end
# private :baseTask
end
class SuperClass < BaseClass
desc 'superTask', 'Super task'
def superTask
puts this_is_not_a_task("super")
end
end
SuperClass.start(ARGV)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With