This fails:
my @a = ("a", "b", "c", "d", "e");
my %h = map { "prefix-$_" => 1 } @a;
with this error:
Not enough arguments for map at foo.pl line 4, near "} @a"
but this works:
my @a = ("a", "b", "c", "d", "e");
my %h = map { "prefix-" . $_ => 1 } @a;
why?
Because Perl is guessing an EXPR (a hash reference, for example) instead of a BLOCK. This should work (note the '+' symbol):
my @a = ("a", "b", "c", "d", "e");
my %h = map { +"prefix-$_" => 1 } @a;
See http://perldoc.perl.org/functions/map.html.
I prefer to write that as
my %h = map { ("prefix-$_" => 1) } @a;
to show the intent, that I am returning a 2-element list.
From perldoc -f map
:
"{" starts both hash references and blocks, so "map { ..."
could be either the start of map BLOCK LIST or map EXPR, LIST.
Because perl doesn’t look ahead for the closing "}" it has to
take a guess at which its dealing with based what it finds just
after the "{". Usually it gets it right, but if it doesn’t it
won’t realize something is wrong until it gets to the "}" and
encounters the missing (or unexpected) comma. The syntax error
will be reported close to the "}" but you’ll need to change
something near the "{" such as using a unary "+" to give perl
some help:
%hash = map { "\L$_", 1 } @array # perl guesses EXPR. wrong
%hash = map { +"\L$_", 1 } @array # perl guesses BLOCK. right
%hash = map { ("\L$_", 1) } @array # this also works
%hash = map { lc($_), 1 } @array # as does this.
%hash = map +( lc($_), 1 ), @array # this is EXPR and works!
%hash = map ( lc($_), 1 ), @array # evaluates to (1, @array)
or to force an anon hash constructor use "+{"
@hashes = map +{ lc($_), 1 }, @array # EXPR, so needs , at end
and you get list of anonymous hashes each with only 1 entry.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With