Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Why does select() consume so much CPU time in my program?

I have several Java applications that use MINA, and all of them use 20 MINA threads. One application serves around 10,000 concurrent connections, that are usually idle but receive input sometimes. 20 is likely a reasonable threadcount for that application, although I haven't exactly profiled it (which this question is getting at). Another application serves only around 15 connections at a time but initiates the IO work so they are very busy, and has 20 MINA threads anyway, which is obviously too many.

The thing that's strange to me is both applications always devote about 30%, sometimes as high as 60%, of their CPU time into MINA's select() method, profiled in VisualVM. The call stack looks like this:

java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:228) at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:81) at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:87) - locked <40ca5d54> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$2) - locked <24649fe8> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) - locked <3fae9662> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:98) at org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.NioProcessor.select(NioProcessor.java:72) at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.run(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:1093) at org.apache.mina.util.NamePreservingRunnable.run(NamePreservingRunnable.java:64) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) 

It seems to be based in a busy poll, which sounds really wrong to me.

Should I be worried when I see the number that high? What causes this? Is it something I need to optimize out or is it more akin to a sleep or idle routine? If it's more like a sleep routine is it somehow scheduled to be lower priority than other CPU work?

Update: this thread seems to be the same issue. I followed its advice, and am now running Java 1.7.0_45, but I am still seeing select taking as high as 90% of CPU time in an application with 10k connections.

We are using MINA 2.0.4, which means this relevant bug is fixed.

like image 956
djechlin Avatar asked Dec 09 '13 16:12

djechlin


People also ask

What makes my CPU usage so high?

You can expect high CPU utilization when playing some games, running a video-editing or streaming application, performing an antivirus scan, or juggling many browser tabs.

Why is my CPU usage at 100%?

If the CPU usage is around 100%, this means that your computer is trying to do more work than it has the capacity for. This is usually OK, but it means that programs may slow down a little. Computers tend to use close to 100% of the CPU when they are doing computationally-intensive things like running games.

Why is CPU usage so high when nothing is running?

The worst scenario for a high CPU usage when nothing pops up in Task Manager is a virus infection or malicious software that runs in the background. To stay safe from any ransomware or other type of viruses that can lead to computer damage, we recommend you to use ESET Internet Security.


2 Answers

Unfortunately, this is wrong interpretation of the numbers.

I've faced this situation many times (and ask a question on stackoverflow too).

The main reason, is VisualVM doesn't show correct CPU time. It showing percentage of the thread time in RUNNING state. But from documentation on Thread.State:

Thread state for a runnable thread. A thread in the runnable state is executing in the Java virtual machine but it may be waiting for other resources from the operating system such as processor.

This is exactly what's going on. Actually, thread is blocked inside OS epoll_wait() call. On Linux box there are several ways you can confirm it's the case.

strace'ing thread

$ strace -tttT -f -p [thread-id] 

Thread id could be obtained from jstack output:

$ jstack [java-pid] [...] "Netty Builtin Server 1" #17 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00000001013dd800 nid=0xe12f runnable [0x0000700001fe4000]   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE   at sun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.kevent0(Native Method)   at sun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.poll(KQueueArrayWrapper.java:198) [...] 

in this case thread id is 0xe12f (should be converted to decimal). You will see the most of the time thread will be in epoll_wait() call.

pidstating thread

$ pidstat -tu -p [java-pid] | grep [thread pid] 

you will see low system as well as user CPU time by this thread, meaning it doesn't consume CPU.

polling thread state using ps

$ ps -eL -o pid,tid,state | grep [thread-id] 

you will see most of the time thread in state S or Sl (interruptible sleep) instead of R (runnable).

In the end you should not worrying about that if there are no operational issues with the service.

like image 149
Denis Bazhenov Avatar answered Oct 08 '22 18:10

Denis Bazhenov


Firstly, it's good that both applications have the same issue; it probably indicates that the issue is with either the JVM or the OS and not your application :-)

As jzd mentioned, nio.select() has had issues. The multiplication of {various versions of Java} x {various platforms, kernel versions} makes it seem like an all-over-the-place issue. I hope one of these works for you :

  • If you are on Linux, try the 2.6 kernel just in case you are on 2.4

    , assuming the bug is akin to : http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6670302

  • Use an older version of the JRE / JDK, not the latest version!

    , i.e., go back to JRE 6 / JDK 6 instead of 7.

Try

  • {older version of JRE (6), older version of Linux kernel} or
  • {newer version of JRE (7), newer version of Linux kernel}

instead of mixing them up as in {older, newer} or {newer, older}.

like image 26
vijucat Avatar answered Oct 08 '22 20:10

vijucat