Every time I use double-quoted strings, I'm getting this kind of suggestion:
When I click the bulb icon I'm getting an option to convert that string into a single-quoted string.
Can someone explain why single-quoted strings are preferred over double-quoted strings?
The main difference between double quotes and single quotes is that by using double quotes, you can include variables directly within the string. It interprets the Escape sequences. Each variable will be replaced by its value.
Both single (' ') and double (" ") quotes are used to represent a string in Javascript. Choosing a quoting style is up to you and there is no special semantics for one style over the other. Nevertheless, it is important to note that there is no type for a single character in javascript, everything is always a string!
Double quotes eliminate the need to escape apostrophes (as in contractions). Consider the string: "I'm going to the mall" , vs. the otherwise escaped version: 'I\'m going to the mall' . Double quotes mean a string in many other languages.
The basic difference between these two methods is Single quotes can not hold/print escape sequences directly, while double quotes can. i.e. Double quoted strings are used for String Interpolation in Ruby.
Single quotes are preferred if there is no interpolation in the string. Ruby will work less (in theory) to output single quote strings which in turn will speed up your code some (again in theory). That is one reason why RubyMine suggests it.
Another reason is for plain readability. Which you can read about here in the style guide: Ruby Coding Style Guide
Benchmark tests has proven that speed gains from using single over double quoted strings is negligible compared to the actual execution time.
Ultimately the answer comes down to style. To learn about performance check out this question: Is there a performance gain in using single quotes vs double quotes in ruby?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With