A proposal document can be split up into many different section types (text, fees, schedule) etc
Here it's modelled using a polymoprhic association on the join table.
class Proposal < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :proposal_sections
has_many :fee_summaries, :through => :proposal_sections, :source => :section, :source_type => 'FeeSummary'
end
class ProposalSection < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :proposal
belongs_to :section, :polymorphic => true
end
class FeeSummary < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :proposal_sections, :as => :section
has_many :proposals, :through => :proposal_sections
end
Whilst #create works fine
summary = @proposal.fee_summaries.create
summary.proposal == @propsal # true
#new doesnt
summary = @proposal.fee_summaries.new
summary.proposal -> nil
Should it be returning nil?
On a regular has_many and belongs_to initialized yet unpersisted records will still return their parent assocation (built in memory).
Why won't this work and is it intended behaviour?
Schema.rb
create_table "fee_summaries", :force => true do |t|
t.datetime "created_at", :null => false
t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false
end
create_table "proposal_sections", :force => true do |t|
t.integer "section_id"
t.string "section_type"
t.integer "proposal_id"
t.datetime "created_at", :null => false
t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false
end
create_table "proposals", :force => true do |t|
t.datetime "created_at", :null => false
t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false
end
ruby 2.0 rails 3.2.14
ActiveRecord can't know that proposal.fee_summaries is reverse association from fee_summary.proposal. It's because you can define your own association name, have additional constraints on it, etc. - to automatically derive which associations are reverse of which would be insanely hard, if not impossible. So even for most straightforward cases you need to tell it explicitly via inverse_of
option on the association declaration. Here's an example for a simple direct association:
class Proposal < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :proposal_sections, :inverse_of => :proposal
end
class ProposalSection < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :proposal, :inverse_of => :proposal_sections
end
2.0.0-p353 :001 > proposal = Proposal.new
=> #<Proposal id: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil>
2.0.0-p353 :002 > section = proposal.proposal_sections.new
=> #<ProposalSection id: nil, proposal_id: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil>
2.0.0-p353 :003 > section.proposal
=> #<Proposal id: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil>
Unfortunately, inverse_of
does not support indirect (through
) and polymorphic assocations. So in your case there's no easy way to make it work. The only workaround I see is to persist the records (use create
), so AR can just query the relationships by key and return correct results.
Check the docs for more examples and explanations: http://apidock.com/rails/ActiveRecord/Associations/ClassMethods
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With