$ echo "Your code is bad and you should feel bad" > "<stdin>"
$ python
Python 3.6.0 (default, Dec 28 2016, 19:53:26)
[GCC 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-11)] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> 2 + '2'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
Your code is bad and you should feel bad
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'str'
Why does Python confuse the string "<stdin>"
with a file matching that filename? I didn't want Python trying to just read whatever files from my disk if it encountered an unhandled exception.
You can also get it with the "<string>"
filename:
$ echo "pining for the fjords" > "<string>"
$ python -c 'wat'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
pining for the fjords
NameError: name 'wat' is not defined
Is there any way to prevent that behaviour, or is it hardcoded into the REPL?
If there is no variable defined with that name you will get a NameError exception. To fix the problem, in Python 2, you can use raw_input() . This returns the string entered by the user and does not attempt to evaluate it. Note that if you were using Python 3, input() behaves the same as raw_input() does in Python 2.
Print Stack Trace in Python Using traceback Module The traceback. format_exc() method returns a string that contains the information about exception and stack trace entries from the traceback object. We can use the format_exc() method to print the stack trace with the try and except statements.
In Python, A traceback is a report containing the function calls made in your code at a specific point i.e when you get an error it is recommended that you should trace it backward(traceback). Whenever the code gets an exception, the traceback will give the information about what went wrong in the code.
Traceback is a python module that provides a standard interface to extract, format and print stack traces of a python program. When it prints the stack trace it exactly mimics the behaviour of a python interpreter. Useful when you want to print the stack trace at any step.
Python doesn't keep track of what source code corresponds to any compiled bytecode. It might not even read that source code until it needs to print a traceback, for example if a module is loaded from a .pyc
file.
When Python needs to print a traceback, that's when it tries to find source code corresponding to all the stack frames involved. The file name and line number you see in the stack trace are all Python has to go on. If it were using the traceback
module, the code path would go through a section in linecache
that excludes filenames starting and ending with <
and >
, but the default sys.excepthook
doesn't go through that path.
The default sys.excepthook
goes through the native call PyErr_Display
, which eventually winds up using _Py_DisplaySourceLine
to display individual source lines. _Py_DisplaySourceLine
unconditionally tries to find the file in the current working directory (for some reason - misguided optimization?), then calls _Py_FindSourceFile
to search sys.path
for a file matching that name if the working directory didn't have it. Usually, it won't find a <stdin>
or <string>
file, and it'll just skip printing source code when it can't find a file, but if it finds one, it prints from that file.
I initially thought you could prevent this by running Python with the -I
flag, putting it in isolated mode. One of the effects of isolated mode is to remove the script's directory from sys.path
. Experiment proved that this didn't change things, which is when I realized _Py_DisplaySourceLine
tries the working directory no matter what.
It would be fairly straightforward to fix this by excluding <>
filenames in the native code path, like linecache
does. The code that unconditionally searches the current directory for the file should also be changed.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With