Facts:
1480
2088
3.10.0-1062.1.2.el7.x86_64
1.4.4
/tmp
is xfs
capsh
output of the two users is identical but for uid / username/etc/sub{u,g}id
files$HOME/.config/containers/storage.conf
is the default and is identical between the two with the exception of the uids. The storage.conf
is below for reference.I wrote the following shell script to demonstrate just how similar an environment the two are operating in:
#!/bin/sh
for i in 1480 2088; do
sudo chroot --userspec "$i":10 / env -i /bin/sh <<EOF
echo -------------- $i ----------------
/usr/sbin/capsh --print
grep "$i" /etc/subuid /etc/subgid
mkdir /tmp/"$i"
HOME=/tmp/"$i"
export HOME
podman --root=/tmp/"$i" info > /tmp/podman."$i"
podman run --rm --root=/tmp/"$i" docker.io/library/busybox printf "\tCOMPLETE\n"
echo -----------END $i END-------------
EOF
sudo rm -rf /tmp/"$i"
done
Here's the output of the script:
$ sh /tmp/podman-fail.sh
[sudo] password for functional:
-------------- 1480 ----------------
Current: =
Bounding set =cap_chown,cap_dac_override,cap_dac_read_search,cap_fowner,cap_fsetid,cap_kill,cap_setgid,cap_setuid,cap_setpcap,cap_linux_immutable,cap_net_bind_service,cap_net_broadcast,cap_net_admin,cap_net_raw,cap_ipc_lock,cap_ipc_owner,cap_sys_module,cap_sys_rawio,cap_sys_chroot,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_sys_pacct,cap_sys_admin,cap_sys_boot,cap_sys_nice,cap_sys_resource,cap_sys_time,cap_sys_tty_config,cap_mknod,cap_lease,cap_audit_write,cap_audit_control,cap_setfcap,cap_mac_override,cap_mac_admin,cap_syslog,35,36
Securebits: 00/0x0/1'b0
secure-noroot: no (unlocked)
secure-no-suid-fixup: no (unlocked)
secure-keep-caps: no (unlocked)
uid=1480(functional)
gid=10(wheel)
groups=0(root)
/etc/subuid:1480:100000:65536
/etc/subgid:1480:100000:65536
Trying to pull docker.io/library/busybox...Getting image source signatures
Copying blob 7c9d20b9b6cd done
Copying config 19485c79a9 done
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
ERRO[0003] could not find slirp4netns, the network namespace won't be configured: exec: "slirp4netns": executable file not found in $PATH
COMPLETE
-----------END 1480 END-------------
-------------- 2088 ----------------
Current: =
Bounding set =cap_chown,cap_dac_override,cap_dac_read_search,cap_fowner,cap_fsetid,cap_kill,cap_setgid,cap_setuid,cap_setpcap,cap_linux_immutable,cap_net_bind_service,cap_net_broadcast,cap_net_admin,cap_net_raw,cap_ipc_lock,cap_ipc_owner,cap_sys_module,cap_sys_rawio,cap_sys_chroot,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_sys_pacct,cap_sys_admin,cap_sys_boot,cap_sys_nice,cap_sys_resource,cap_sys_time,cap_sys_tty_config,cap_mknod,cap_lease,cap_audit_write,cap_audit_control,cap_setfcap,cap_mac_override,cap_mac_admin,cap_syslog,35,36
Securebits: 00/0x0/1'b0
secure-noroot: no (unlocked)
secure-no-suid-fixup: no (unlocked)
secure-keep-caps: no (unlocked)
uid=2088(broken)
gid=10(wheel)
groups=0(root)
/etc/subuid:2088:100000:65536
/etc/subgid:2088:100000:65536
Trying to pull docker.io/library/busybox...Getting image source signatures
Copying blob 7c9d20b9b6cd done
Copying config 19485c79a9 done
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
ERRO[0003] Error while applying layer: ApplyLayer exit status 1 stdout: stderr: there might not be enough IDs available in the namespace (requested 65534:65534 for /home): lchown /home: invalid argument
ERRO[0003] Error pulling image ref //busybox:latest: Error committing the finished image: error adding layer with blob "sha256:7c9d20b9b6cda1c58bc4f9d6c401386786f584437abbe87e58910f8a9a15386b": ApplyLayer exit status 1 stdout: stderr: there might not be enough IDs available in the namespace (requested 65534:65534 for /home): lchown /home: invalid argument
Failed
Error: unable to pull docker.io/library/busybox: unable to pull image: Error committing the finished image: error adding layer with blob "sha256:7c9d20b9b6cda1c58bc4f9d6c401386786f584437abbe87e58910f8a9a15386b": ApplyLayer exit status 1 stdout: stderr: there might not be enough IDs available in the namespace (requested 65534:65534 for /home): lchown /home: invalid argument
Here's the storage.conf
for the 1480
uid. It's identical except s/1480/2088/
:
[storage]
driver = "vfs"
runroot = "/run/user/1480"
graphroot = "/tmp/1480/.local/share/containers/storage"
[storage.options]
size = ""
remap-uids = ""
remap-gids = ""
remap-user = ""
remap-group = ""
ostree_repo = ""
skip_mount_home = ""
mount_program = ""
mountopt = ""
[storage.options.thinpool]
autoextend_percent = ""
autoextend_threshold = ""
basesize = ""
blocksize = ""
directlvm_device = ""
directlvm_device_force = ""
fs = ""
log_level = ""
min_free_space = ""
mkfsarg = ""
mountopt = ""
use_deferred_deletion = ""
use_deferred_removal = ""
xfs_nospace_max_retries = ""
You can see there's basically no difference between the two podman info
outputs for the users:
$ diff -u /tmp/podman.1480 /tmp/podman.2088
--- /tmp/podman.1480 2019-10-17 22:41:21.991573733 -0400
+++ /tmp/podman.2088 2019-10-17 22:41:26.182584536 -0400
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Distribution:
distribution: '"centos"'
version: "7"
- MemFree: 45654056960
+ MemFree: 45652697088
MemTotal: 67306323968
OCIRuntime:
package: containerd.io-1.2.6-3.3.el7.x86_64
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
kernel: 3.10.0-1062.1.2.el7.x86_64
os: linux
rootless: true
- uptime: 30h 17m 50.23s (Approximately 1.25 days)
+ uptime: 30h 17m 54.42s (Approximately 1.25 days)
registries:
blocked: null
insecure: null
@@ -35,14 +35,14 @@
- quay.io
- registry.centos.org
store:
- ConfigFile: /tmp/1480/.config/containers/storage.conf
+ ConfigFile: /tmp/2088/.config/containers/storage.conf
ContainerStore:
number: 0
GraphDriverName: vfs
GraphOptions: null
- GraphRoot: /tmp/1480
+ GraphRoot: /tmp/2088
GraphStatus: {}
ImageStore:
number: 0
- RunRoot: /run/user/1480
- VolumePath: /tmp/1480/volumes
+ RunRoot: /run/user/2088
+ VolumePath: /tmp/2088/volumes
I refuse to believe there's an if (2088 == uid) { abort(); }
or similar nonsense somewhere in podman's source code. What am I missing?
podman unshare lets you run a command in the same user namespace as your containers. podman unshare runs a command in Podman's modified user namespace. It's intended to be run with rootless podman (where you run podman as a non-root user).
Podman is a project from Red Hat that is open source and free to download. It is a relative newcomer to the containerization scene, with version 1.0 being released in 2019.
Does podman system migrate
fix there might not be enough IDs available in the namespace
for you?
It did for me and others: https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/3421
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With