Why does R's base plot function do this? We have to use points
or lines
, which needs special code rather than using the type
argument.
plot(1:10)
plot(10:1, add = TRUE)
Warning messages:
1: In plot.window(...) : "add" is not a graphical parameter
2: In plot.xy(xy, type, ...) : "add" is not a graphical parameter
3: In axis(side = side, at = at, labels = labels, ...) :
Etc.
Many packages provide methods for (i.e. "override") plot and provide the obvious ability to plot(obj, add = TRUE) as long as obj
is of the appropriate class. (Examples are sp
, raster
, spatstat
.)
Is there any reason plot.default
does not already?
EDIT: this was discussed at length here:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2008-March/048628.html
DM effectively answers it here:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2008-March/048650.html
Because plot.default
doesn't have an add
argument
> args(plot.default)
function (x, y = NULL, type = "p", xlim = NULL, ylim = NULL,
log = "", main = NULL, sub = NULL, xlab = NULL, ylab = NULL,
ann = par("ann"), axes = TRUE, frame.plot = axes, panel.first = NULL,
panel.last = NULL, asp = NA, ...)
NULL
Those other functions are not overriding plot
but are providing their own methods, which do have an argument add
because they were written that way. Personally, having grown up with using points()
and lines()
etc I don't find them much extra work and I would use them in preference to a plot
method with an add
argument, although we've written both ways in packages that I contribute to.
As to why plot.default
doesn't have an add
argument? You'd have to ask R Core, but I can suggest some reasons
plot.default
is designed to generate an entire plot on the devicepoints()
and lines()
etc so why duplicate?plot.default
is simpler code without code to handle add
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With