Haskell allows:
a:: Int
a = 3
data MyList a = Nil | Cons a (MyList a)
Whereas Idris will complain with a is bound as an implicit
,
and I need to use a different type argument:
a: Int
a = 3
data MyList b = Nil | Cons b (MyList b)
Actually, Idris does not conflate them here, because a
is lower case. But it could – other than Haskell – because it supports values in types. So the compiler warns you, because that is a common source for errors. Suppose you write:
n : Nat
n = 3
doNothing : Vect n Int -> Vect n Int
doNothing xs = xs
You might expect that doNothing
's type is Vect 3 Int -> Vect 3 Int
. But instead lower case arguments are bound to be implicit and doNothing
's type is actually {n : Nat} -> Vect n Int -> Vect n Int
, despite the previous declared n
. You'd have to write Vect Main.n Int
or make N
upper case to use it.
So the compiler thinks that maybe you wanted to do something similiar with the a
in MyList a
and warns you.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With