I just created a proxy model and was surprised that manage.py makemigrations
creates a new migration file with a migrations.CreateModel
operation.
A proxy model does not create a new database table, it's just a different python interface to the same dataset and indeed manage.py sqlmigrate my_app_label 0042
returns nothing.
I thought that it might be used to create the proxy model ContentType
but those are created on demand if they don't exist.
Is it used to trigger the creation of the proxy model permissions? There's a 6 year old open bug on proxy model permissions so I'm not really sure how this part is supposed to work now...
It used Django 1.8
to test this.
Edit: to clarify, Django
creates a migration that does nothing for new proxy models so wouldn't we want Django
to not create the migration in the first place if it's of no use?
Is there a use case where it would be useful to have the migration?
Ah, but if you open the migration in your editor, you will find that it's actually an empty migration! Here is an example
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
dependencies = [
('stackoverflow', '0009_auto_20160622_1507'),
]
operations = [
migrations.CreateModel(
name='MyArticle',
fields=[
],
options={
'proxy': True,
},
bases=('stackoverflow.article',),
),
]
And if you run ./manage.py sqlmigrate myapp 0010
(which is the number that corresponds to my migration above), what you get is what's on the next line (nothing).
This is because the fields
section of the migration is empty and option
includes proxy = True
. This setting prevents any SQL
from being executed for this migration, and the original table is left untouched.
So you may ask, why does Django
bother to create an empty migration? That's because the proxy model may be referred to by another model in a future migration.
I believe migrations
are generated because the databases is affected and migrations
are how Django signals database changes. The structure is not changed, but entries are added in (at least) two tables:
ContentType
is added to django_content_type
for the proxy model.auth_permission
. I assume this "always" happens unless the proxy uses the exact same class name. It certainly does happen -- we actually use a proxy model to access User using different permissions without touching the default User model.Both of these details are actually noted in the comment chain of the issue linked by the OP (e.g. comment #31) because they contribute to the bug (i.e. that Django looks for permissions in a different app than those actually generated in auth_permissions
).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With