Why does C not allow concatenating strings when using the conditional operator?

Question

The following code compiles without problems:

int main() {     printf("Hi" "Bye"); } 

However, this does not compile:

int main() {     int test = 0;     printf("Hi" (test ? "Bye" : "Goodbye")); } 

What is the reason for that?

Answer 1

As per the C11 standard, chapter §5.1.1.2, concatenation of adjacent string literals:

Adjacent string literal tokens are concatenated.

happens in translation phase. On the other hand:

printf("Hi" (test ? "Bye" : "Goodbye")); 

involves the conditional operator, which is evaluated at run-time. So, at compile time, during the translation phase, there are no adjacent string literals present, hence the concatenation is not possible. The syntax is invalid and thus reported by your compiler.

---

To elaborate a bit on the why part, during the preprocessing phase, the adjacent string literals are concatenated and represented as a single string literal (token). The storage is allocated accordingly and the concatenated string literal is considered as a single entity (one string literal).

On the other hand, in case of run-time concatenation, the destination should have enough memory to hold the concatenated string literal otherwise, there will be no way that the expected concatenated output can be accessed. Now, in case of string literals, they are already allocated memory at compile-time and cannot be extended to fit in any more incoming input into or appended to the original content. In other words, there will be no way that the concatenated result can be accessed (presented) as a single string literal. So, this construct in inherently incorrect.

Just FYI, for run-time string (not literals) concatenation, we have the library function strcat() which concatenates two strings. Notice, the description mentions:

char *strcat(char * restrict s1,const char * restrict s2);

The strcat() function appends a copy of the string pointed to by s2 (including the terminating null character) to the end of the string pointed to by s1. The initial character of s2 overwrites the null character at the end of s1. [...]

So, we can see, the s1 is a string, not a string literal. However, as the content of s2 is not altered in any way, it can very well be a string literal.