I've seen solutions for updating a sequence when it goes out of sync with the primary key it's generating, but I don't understand how this problem occurs in the first place.
Does anyone have insight into how a primary key field, with its default defined as the nextval of a sequence, whose primary keys aren't set explicitly anywhere, can go out of sync with the sequence? I'm using Postgres, and we see this occur now and then. It results eventually in a duplicate key constraint when the sequence produces an id for an existing row.
Your application is probably occasionally setting the value for the primary key for a new row. Then postgresql has no need to get a new sequence and the sequence doesn't get updated.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With