When I try working on unsigned integers in MIPS, the result of every operation I do remains signed (that is, the integers are all in 2's complement), even though every operation I perform is an unsigned one: addu
, multu
and so fourth...
When I print numbers in the range [2^31, 2^32 - 1]
I get their 'overflowed' negative value as if they were signed (I guess they are).
Though, when I try something like this:
li $v0, 1
li $a0, 2147483648 # or any bigger number
syscall
the printed number is always 2147483647 (2^31 - 1)
I'm confused... What am I missing?
PS : I haven't included my code as it isn't very readable (such is assembly code) and putting aside this problem, seems to be working fine. If anyone feels it is necessary I shall include it right away!
The only difference between signed and unsigned instructions is that signed instructions can generate an overflow exception and unsigned instructions can not.
Signed numbers use sign flag or can be distinguish between negative values and positive values. Whereas unsigned numbers stored only positive numbers but not negative numbers.
In MIPS, the largest unsigned number is 232–1, or about 4.3 billion. Hexadecimal is frequently used as a shorthand for binary numbers, because one hex digit corresponds to four bits.
Arithmetic overflow occurs during the execution of an add, addi, or sub instruction. If the result of the computation is too large or too small to hold in the result register, the Overflow output of the ALU will become high during the execute state. This event triggers an exception.
From Wikipedia:
The MIPS32 Instruction Set states that the word unsigned as part of Add and Subtract instructions, is a misnomer. The difference between signed and unsigned versions of commands is not a sign extension (or lack thereof) of the operands, but controls whether a trap is executed on overflow (e.g. Add) or an overflow is ignored (Add unsigned). An immediate operand CONST to these instructions is always sign-extended.
From the MIPS Instruction Reference:
ALL arithmetic immediate values are sign-extended [...] The only difference between signed and unsigned instructions is that signed instructions can generate an overflow exception and unsigned instructions can not.
It looks to me like the real problem is the syscall that you are using to print numbers. It appears to and to always interpret what you pass as signed, and to possibly to bound as as well.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With