Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Why do I have to evaluate this twice?

I cannot figure out why I have to evaluate this twice (in Mathematica 7) for the assignment to take.

First evaluation:

Unprotect[Rule];
Attributes[Rule]
pp = Plot | LogLinearPlot | ListPlot | ParametricPlot3D;
(h : pp)[True -> False] ^:= Print["Irrelevant data"]

(*

Out[2]= {SequenceHold}

During evaluation of In[1]:= UpSetDelayed::write: Tag Rule in (h:Plot|LogLinearPlot|ListPlot|ParametricPlot3D)[True->False] is Protected. >>

Out[4]= $Failed

*)

As can be seen from Out[2]= {SequenceHold}, Unprotect[Rule] worked, yet the error message indicates otherwise. If I evaluate the cell a second time, the assignment takes and no error is generated.

Why does this happen?

like image 413
Mr.Wizard Avatar asked Apr 13 '11 12:04

Mr.Wizard


1 Answers

As you might well know, Mathematica loads binary MX files that implement some of its functionality. These MX files store implementations as well as definitions and attributes.

This is insidious, but your Unprotect[Rule] is undone by Mathematica's newly loaded MX file, and this explains why it worked the second time. Because Mathematica had already loaded all MX files it needed.

If you first evaluate all the symbols in your expression, then it stops complaining:

{Unprotect, Rule, Attributes, Plot, LogLinearPlot, ListPlot, 
  ParametricPlot3D, True, False, Print};
Unprotect[Rule];
Attributes[Rule];
pp = Plot | LogLinearPlot | ListPlot | ParametricPlot3D;
(h : pp)[True -> False] ^:= Print["Irrelevant data"]

EDIT The first evaluation is needed to trigger all the auto-loading before you unprotect Rule.

like image 160
Sasha Avatar answered Nov 23 '22 00:11

Sasha