Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Why cast a String to a String?

Tags:

java

string

An article on the Oracle Java Community sites gives as an example (for a JPA Converter, but that's not relevant, I guess) the following method:

public Boolean convertToEntityAttribute(String y) {
    String val = (String) y;
    if(val.equals("Y")){
        return true;
    } else {
        return false;
    }
}

What is the use of casting the String y to a String val? Is there a valid reason to do this?

Original article: What's New in JPA

like image 309
Martijn Burger Avatar asked Dec 07 '15 11:12

Martijn Burger


2 Answers

Such cast is completely unnecessary. I can imagine that it was before

public Boolean convertToEntityAttribute(Object y) {
    String val = (String) y;
    ...
}

But later the argument type was changed to String and the author simply forgot to remove the cast.

like image 172
Tagir Valeev Avatar answered Oct 03 '22 08:10

Tagir Valeev


Is there a valid reason to do this?

None whatsoever1.

But the flipside is that the Java compiler knows that the typecast is unnecessary and optimizes it away. So the only "damage" is to readability.

For example.

[stephen@blackbox tmp]$ cat Test.java 
public class Test {
    public void test (String x) {
        String s = (String) x;
        System.out.println(s);
    }
}
[stephen@blackbox tmp]$ javac Test.java 
[stephen@blackbox tmp]$ javap -c Test
Compiled from "Test.java"
public class Test {
  public Test();
    Code:
       0: aload_0
       1: invokespecial #1                  // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
       4: return

  public void test(java.lang.String);
    Code:
       0: aload_1
       1: astore_2
       2: getstatic     #2                  // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
       5: aload_2
       6: invokevirtual #3                  // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V
       9: return
}
[stephen@blackbox tmp]$ 

The statement String s = (String) x; is compiled to a simple load and a store; no checkcast instruction.

I wouldn't be surprised if the JIT compiler was capable of optimizing away a redundant checkcast ... if it saw one.


1 - ... in hand written code. In source code that was generated, a redundant typecast could be serve the purpose of making it easier to write the source code generator. After all, the readability of generated code is largely irrelevant.

like image 24
Stephen C Avatar answered Oct 03 '22 06:10

Stephen C