The following program is illegal, and I would like to understand why:
#include <functional>
#include <iostream>
template<typename Result, typename Arg>
void deduce(std::function<Result(Arg)> f)
{
std::cout << "Result: " << typeid(Result).name() << std::endl;
std::cout << "Arg: " << typeid(Arg).name() << std::endl;
}
int main()
{
auto f = [](int x)
{
return x + 1;
};
deduce(f);
return 0;
}
clang
's output:
$ clang -std=c++11 test.cpp
test.cpp:48:3: error: no matching function for call to 'deduce'
deduce(f);
^~~~~~
test.cpp:26:6: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'function<type-parameter-0-1 (type-parameter-0-0)>' against '<lambda at test.cpp:34:13>'
void deduce(std::function<T2(T1)> f)
^
1 error generated.
It seems like I ought to be able to convert my lambda to the std::function
received by deduce
. Why is it not possible for the compiler to apply an appropriate conversion in this case?
The problem is that while a lambda that takes an int
and returns an int
can be converted into a std::function<int(int)>
, its type is not std::function<int(int)>
but an arbitrary implementation-defined type I think.
You can work around this by telling the compiler what types you want. Then the conversion will happen as expected.
auto f = [](int x){ return x + 1; };
deduce<int, int>(f); // now ok
Alternatively, be explicit on the static type of f
.
std::function<int(int)> f = [](int x){ return x + 1; };
deduce(f); // now also ok
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With