Working on an idea for a simple HTMLElement
wrapper I stumbled upon the following for Internet Explorer and Chrome:
For a given HTMLElement
with an id
in the DOM tree, it is possible to retrieve the <div>
using its ID as a variable name or as a property of window
. So for a <div>
like
<div id="example">some text</div>
in Internet Explorer 8 and Chrome you can do:
alert(example.innerHTML); // Alerts "some text".
or
alert(window["example"].innerHTML); // Alerts "some text".
So, does this mean every element in the DOM tree is converted to a property on the global object? And does it also mean one can use this as a replacement for the getElementById
method in these browsers?
What is supposed to happen is that ‘named elements’ are added as apparent properties of the document
object. This is a really bad idea, as it allows element names to clash with real properties of document
.
IE made the situation worse by also adding named elements as properties of the window
object. This is doubly bad in that now you have to avoid naming your elements after any member of either the document
or the window
object you (or any other library code in your project) might want to use.
It also means that these elements are visible as global-like variables. Luckily in this case any real global var
or function
declarations in your code shadow them, so you don't need to worry so much about naming here, but if you try to do an assignment to a global variable with a clashing name and you forget to declare it var
, you'll get an error in IE as it tries to assign the value to the element itself.
It's generally considered bad practice to omit var
, as well as to rely on named elements being visible on window
or as globals. Stick to document.getElementById
, which is more widely-supported and less ambiguous. You can write a trivial wrapper function with a shorter name if you don't like the typing. Either way, there's no point in using an id-to-element lookup cache, because browsers typically optimise the getElementById
call to use a quick lookup anyway; all you get is problems when elements change id
or are added/removed from the document.
Opera copied IE, then WebKit joined in, and now both the previously-unstandardised practice of putting named elements on document
properties, and the previously-IE-only practice of putting them on window
are being standardised by HTML5, whose approach is to document and standardise every terrible practice inflicted on us by browser authors, making them part of the web forever. So Firefox 4 will also support this.
What are ‘named elements’? Anything with an id
, and anything with a name
being used for ‘identifying’ purposes: that is, forms, images, anchors and a few others, but not other unrelated instances of a name
attribute, like control-names in form input fields, parameter names in <param>
or metadata type in <meta>
. ‘Identifying’ name
s are the ones that should be avoided in favour of id
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With