I've tried to make a simple directive which displays a name and allows it to be change. When I put multiple directive on the name page they all seem to share the name attribute. What am I doing wrong?
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html ng-app="app">
<head>
<meta charset=utf-8 />
<title></title>
<script src="http://code.angularjs.org/1.2.0-rc.3/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="http://code.angularjs.org/1.2.0-rc.3/angular-resource.min.js"></script>
<script src="http://code.angularjs.org/1.2.0-rc.3/angular-animate.min.js"></script>
<script>
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.directive('person', function () {
function link ($scope, elem, attrs, ctrl) {
$scope.name = "OLD"
$scope.setName = function() {
$scope.name = 'NEW';
}
}
return {
restrict: 'E',
replace: true,
template: "<span>Current name = {{name}}<a href='' class='btn' ng-click='setName()'>Change name</a><br></span>",
link : link,
}
});
app.controller('MainCtrl', function ($scope) { });
</script>
</head>
<body ng-controller='MainCtrl'>
<person></person><br>
<person></person><br>
<person></person><br>
<person></person><br>
</body>
</html>
Shared scope: directive and controllers share the scope and the data. We cannot pass data explicitly to the directive. 2. Inherited scope: directive inherits the scope of the controller.
By default, directives do not create their own scope; instead they use the scope of their parent, generally a controller (within the scope of which the directive is defined). We can change the default scope of the directive using the scope field of the DDO (Data Definition Object).
AngularJS Scope InheritanceScope is basically controller specific. Whenever we nest a controller, that means to declare a controller inside a controller then the child controller inherits the scope of the parent controller.
AngularJS ScopeThe scope is the binding part between the HTML (view) and the JavaScript (controller). The scope is an object with the available properties and methods. The scope is available for both the view and the controller.
As mentioned in previous answers, the default behavior of AngularJS directives is to share the scope that they are included in. This behavior is changed via the scope
parameter in the directive definition object.
You can view the documentation for the scope argument in this section of the AngularJS documents: http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.$compile#description_comprehensive-directive-api_directive-definition-object
This argument has three options:
scope: false
- the default behavior of sharing the scope the directive is included in
scope: true
- create a new scope for the directive that acts like other child scopes and prototypically inherits from its parent scope
scope: {}
- create an isolated scope that does not prototypically inherit from its parent scope
As you can see with the JSBin examples, both options 2 and 3 will work for your example. The difference is whether you want your new scopes isolated or not.
The directives section of the AngularJS guide has a good section on why isolated scope can help create better reusable modules with directives: AngularJS Guide: Isolating the Scope of a Directive
By default if you don't isolate the scope of a directive you will share the "outside" scope with all instances of your person directive. With your current implementation you'd need to create a different controller each time in order to re-use such a directive.
BUT there is a solution to this flaw and it s called isolate scope. To do this, you can use a directive's scope option like so :
return {
restrict: 'E',
replace: true,
scope : {}, // this is where the magic happens
template: "<span>Current name = {{name}}<a href='' class='btn' ng-click='setName()'>Change name</a><br></span>",
link : link,
}
You have a complete example and explenation over here section Isolating the Scope of a Directive
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With