I know that on 64bit Windows 32 bit applications go into C:\Program Files (x86)
by default, and 64-bit into C:\Program Files
.
But what if you have a more complex installation package including, say, one client component (32-bit) and one server component (64-bit) and possibly a few helper tools (32-bit). What should the default install path be in this case?
According to some articles, mixing bitness is discouraged by Microsoft and some installation frameworks:
I fail to see why mixing these should be such a big no-no, considering how well x64 platform runs x86 applications and even more so with managed code where the very same binaries can run in both modes. In my case, 75% of the accompanying libraries are shared between client and server and are completely identical, so it does not make sense to split them up.
So given this, which is the preferred install location for this mix of 32 and 64-bit applications? C:\Program Files (x86)
or C:\Program Files
? As I see it, the 64-bit location is preferrable. I see the Program Files (x86) directory as a legacy sandbox for old applications who were never designed for 64-bit applications in mind. In the case of a hybrid 32/64-bit application, 64-bit awareness exists and so there should be no legacy reasons to sandbox the 32-bit files away from the 64-bit ones. To me, the path without "(x86)" is also more visually appealing and indicates that it's a modern application - adapted for 64-bit operation (where necessary).
Does anybody know of other reasons for or against placing a 32/64-bit mix of executables into the 64-bit directory when installed as one application in the same installer package?
if you want to go back to the 32-bit version of Windows, you'll need to download the media creation tool — the 64-bit one, if you're running the 64-bit version of Windows 10 — and use it to create 32-bit installation media. Boot from that installation media and reinstall the 32-bit version over the 64-bit version.
On a 64-bit version of Windows, 64-bit programs are stored in the “C:\Program Files” folder and 32-bit programs are stored in the “C:\Program Files (x86)” folder.
It is good to have both versions of R because sometimes the 32-bit version is faster to run, but it is limited to 3Gb of RAM. The 64-bit version is not limited and can access as much RAM as your computer has.
The 64-bit versions of Windows don't provide support for 16-bit binaries or 32-bit drivers. Programs that depend on 16-bit binaries or 32-bit drivers can't run on the 64-bit versions of Windows unless the program manufacturer provides an update for the program.
As far as I know, that only reason that it is discouraged is that very issue you mentioned, where would its default install path go? I am in agreement with you, if a default path was decided upon, then it would make it easier to synergies two bit types, and make more complex programs possible. Hope this helps! :)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With