Say I have an HTML structure like
<div id="a">
<div id="b">
<div id="c"></div>
</div>
</div>
To do a query for the children of "a" using querySelectorAll I can do something like
//Get "b", but not "c"
document.querySelectorAll('#a > div')
My question is: is it possible to do this without the ID, referencing the node directly? I tried doing
var a_div = document.getElementById('a')
a_div.querySelectorAll('> div') //<-- error here
but I get an error telling me that the selector I used is invalid.
And in case anyone is wondering, my real use case would be something more complicated like '> .foo .bar .baz' so I would prefer to avoid manual DOM traversal. Currently I am adding a temporary id to the root div but that seems like an ugly hack...
Document.querySelectorAll() The Document method querySelectorAll() returns a static (not live) NodeList representing a list of the document's elements that match the specified group of selectors.
Use the querySelectorAll() method to select elements by multiple ids, e.g. document. querySelectorAll('#box1, #box2, #box3') . The method takes a string containing one or more selectors as a parameter and returns a collection of the matching elements. Here is the HTML for the examples in this article.
Use the :scope pseudo-class to get the direct children of an element using querySelectorAll, e.g. parent. querySelectorAll(':scope > div') . When used with the querySelectorAll method, :scope matches the element on which the method was called.
Differences: As seen above, querySelector() methodcan only be used to access a single element while querySelectorAll() method can be used to access all elements which match with a specified CSS selector. To return all matches, querySelectorAll has to be used, while to return a single match, querySelector is used.
document.querySelector('#a').querySelectorAll(':scope > div')
I am not sure about browser support, but I use it on chrome and chrome mobile packaged apps and it works fine.
No, there isn't a way (yet) to reference all childs of some element without using a reference to that element. Because >
is a child combinator, which represents a relationship between a parent and child element, a simple selector (a parent) is necessary (which is missing in you example).
In a comment, BoltClock said that the Selectors API Level 2 specification defines a method findAll
name may change"which accepts as an argument what will probably be known as a relative selector (a selector that can start with a combinator rather than a compound selector)".
When this is implemented, it can be used as follows:
a_div.findAll('> div');
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With