Is there any semantic difference in pairwise composing with zip()
vs. zipWith(
) in RxJava? Is the choice between the static zip and the .zipWith purely stylistic?
RxJava Parallelization Concurrency : Zip() Operator Zip operator is used to combine emission from multiple observable into a single observable. Marble Diagram for Zip Operator. Zip Operator Works in Sequence. That means each observable will be executed sequentially.
RxJava, once the hottest framework in Android development, is dying. It's dying quietly, without drawing much attention to itself. RxJava's former fans and advocates moved on to new shiny things, so there is no one left to say a proper eulogy over this, once very popular, framework.
Single. Single is an Observable that always emit only one value or throws an error. A typical use case of Single observable would be when we make a network call in Android and receive a response. Sample Implementation: The below code always emits a Single user object.
RxJava is a Java library that enables Functional Reactive Programming in Android development. It raises the level of abstraction around threading in order to simplify the implementation of complex concurrent behavior.
Convenience and context.
The static zip
is useful when you have two sources already assembled and now you want to zip them together. Most of the time they are themselves long chains or come from all over the place.
Observable<T1> source1 = op().op().op().op().op();
Observable<T2> source2 = op().op().op().op().op();
Observable.zip(source1, source2, (a, b) -> a + b);
The instance zipWith
is useful when one of the sources is longer while the other is shorter. At that point, it is more convenient to zip with the shorter one.
public Observable<R> withIndex(Observable<T> source, Func2<Integer, T, R> func) {
return source.zipWith(Observable.range(0, Integer.MAX_VALUE),
(t, idx) -> func(idx, t));
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With