Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

When to use weak references in Python?

Can anyone explain usage of weak references?

The documentation doesn't explain it precisely, it just says that the GC can destroy the object linked to via a weak reference at any time. Then what's the point of having an object that can disappear at any time? What if I need to use it right after it disappeared?

Can you please explain them with some good examples?

Thanks

like image 856
bodacydo Avatar asked Mar 12 '10 22:03

bodacydo


People also ask

Why do we use weak references?

A weak reference permits the garbage collector to collect the object while still allowing the application to access the object. A weak reference is valid only during the indeterminate amount of time until the object is collected when no strong references exist.

What is a weak reference Python?

A weak reference to an object is not enough to keep the object alive: when the only remaining references to a referent are weak references, garbage collection is free to destroy the referent and reuse its memory for something else.

How do you make a weak reference in Python?

To create weak references in python, we need to use the weakref module. The weakref is not sufficient to keep the object alive. A basic use of the weak reference is to implement cache or mappings for a large object. Not all objects can be weakly referenced.

How does a weak reference work?

Weak reference objects, which do not prevent their referents from being made finalizable, finalized, and then reclaimed. Weak references are most often used to implement canonicalizing mappings. Suppose that the garbage collector determines at a certain point in time that an object is weakly reachable.


2 Answers

Events are a common scenario for weak references.


Problem

Consider a pair of objects: Emitter and Receiver. The receiver has shorter lifetime than the emitter.

You could try an implementation like this:

class Emitter(object):      def __init__(self):         self.listeners = set()      def emit(self):         for listener in self.listeners:             # Notify             listener('hello')   class Receiver(object):      def __init__(self, emitter):          emitter.listeners.add(self.callback)      def callback(self, msg):         print 'Message received:', msg   e = Emitter() l = Receiver(e) e.emit() # Message received: hello 

However, in this case, the Emitter keeps a reference to a bound method callback that keeps a reference to the Receiver. So the Emitter keeps the Receiver alive:

# ...continued...  del l e.emit() # Message received: hello 

This is sometimes troublesome. Imagine that Emitter is a part of some data model that indicates when data changes and Receiver was created by a dialog window that listens to that changes to update some UI controls.

Through the application's lifetime, multiple dialogs can be spawned and we don't want their receivers to be still registered inside the Emitter long after the window had been closed. That would be a memory leak.

Removing the callbacks manually is one option (just as troublesome), using weak references is another.


Solution

There's a nice class WeakSet that looks like a normal set but stores its members using weak references and no longer stores them when they are freed.

Excellent! Let's use it:

def __init__(self):     self.listeners = weakref.WeakSet() 

and run again:

e = Emitter() l = Receiver(e) e.emit() del l e.emit() 

Oh, nothing happens at all! That's because the bound method (a specific receiver's callback) is orphaned now - neither the Emitter nor the Receiver hold a strong reference to it. Hence it's garbage collected immediately.

Let's make the Receiver (not the Emitter this time) keep a strong reference to this callback:

class Receiver(object):      def __init__(self, emitter):          # Create the bound method object         cb = self.callback          # Register it         emitter.listeners.add(cb)         # But also create an own strong reference to keep it alive         self._callbacks = set([cb]) 

Now we can observe the expected behaviour: the Emitter only keeps the callback as long as the Receiver lives.

e = Emitter() l = Receiver(e) assert len(e.listeners) == 1  del l import gc; gc.collect() assert len(e.listeners) == 0 

Under the hood

Note that I've had to put a gc.collect() here to make sure that the receiver is really cleaned up immediately. It's needed here because now there's a cycle of strong references: the bound method refers to the receiver and vice versa.

This isn't very bad; this only means that the receiver's cleanup will be deferred until the next garbage collector run. Cyclic references can't be cleaned up by the simple reference counting mechanism.

If you really want, you could remove the strong reference cycle by replacing the bound method with a custom function object that would keep its self as a weak reference too.

def __init__(self, emitter):      # Create the bound method object     weakself = weakref.ref(self)     def cb(msg):         self = weakself()         self.callback(msg)      # Register it     emitter.listeners.add(cb)     # But also create an own strong reference to keep it alive     self._callbacks = set([cb]) 

Let's put that logic into a helper function:

def weak_bind(instancemethod):      weakref_self = weakref.ref(instancemethod.im_self)     func = instancemethod.im_func      def callback(*args, **kwargs):         self = weakref_self()         bound = func.__get__(self)         return bound(*args, **kwargs)      return callback  class Receiver(object):      def __init__(self, emitter):          cb = weak_bind(self.callback)          # Register it         emitter.listeners.add(cb)         # But also create an own strong reference to keep it alive         self._callbacks = set([cb]) 

Now there's no cycle of strong references, so when Receiver is freed, the callback function will also be freed (and removed from the Emitter's WeakSet) immediately, without the need for a full GC cycle.

like image 187
Kos Avatar answered Sep 17 '22 13:09

Kos


The typical use for weak references is if A has a reference to B and B has a reference to A. Without a proper cycle-detecting garbage collector, those two objects would never get GC'd even if there are no references to either from the "outside". However if one of the references is "weak", the objects will get properly GC'd.

However, Python does have a cycle-detecting garbage collector (since 2.0!), so that doesn't count :)

Another use for weak references is for caches. It's mentioned in the weakref documentation:

A primary use for weak references is to implement caches or mappings holding large objects, where it’s desired that a large object not be kept alive solely because it appears in a cache or mapping.

If the GC decides to destroy one of those objects, and you need it, you can just recalculate / refetch the data.

like image 29
Nicolás Avatar answered Sep 18 '22 13:09

Nicolás