The performance of InnoDB for large volumes of data is better as compared to MyISAM. MyISAM doesn't support transactional properties and is faster to read. As compared to InnoDB, the performance for a high volume of data is less.
- MyISAM is faster than InnoDB in most of the cases. - MyISAM table is stored as a separate file which can be compressed. - This means that MyISAM has a better storage management. - MyISAM supports full indexing that is not supported by InnoDb.
The main differences between MyISAM and InnoDB Overall, MyISAM is an older and less efficient storage engine than InnoDB. The most commonly noted differences between these two engines are as follows: InnoDB is more stable, faster, and easier to set up; it also supports transactions.
MyISAM doesn't support transactions (and the other things mentioned) so it can work faster. MyISAM is a way to achieve higher performance in those situations when you do not need these features. "These features" being everything that makes an RDBMS an RDBMS: ACID (It's a bit of a hyperbole, but still...)
Read about Storage Engines.
MyISAM:
The MyISAM storage engine in MySQL.
InnoDB:
The InnoDB storage engine in MySQL.
MyISAM Limitations:
InnoDB Limitations:
ROW_FORMAT=COMPRESSED
)For brief understanding read below links:
Use MyISAM for very unimportant data or if you really need those minimal performance advantages. The read performance is not better in every case for MyISAM.
I would personally never use MyISAM at all anymore. Choose InnoDB and throw a bit more hardware if you need more performance. Another idea is to look at database systems with more features like PostgreSQL if applicable.
EDIT: For the read-performance, this link shows that innoDB often is actually not slower than MyISAM: https://www.percona.com/blog/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With