Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

When to use explicit wait vs implicit wait in Selenium Webdriver?

I am using:

driver.manage().timeouts().implicitlyWait(180, TimeUnit.SECONDS); 

But it still fails continuously for the below element

    driver.findElement(By.id("name")).clear();     driver.findElement(By.id("name")).sendKeys("Create_title_01"); 

I have added wait code:

for (int second = 0;; second++) {         if (second >= 120) fail("timeout");         try { if (isElementPresent(By.id("name"))) break; } catch (Exception e) {}         Thread.sleep(1000);     } 

Shouldn't implicit wait take care of waiting till an element is found? Also would it be better if I use Explicit wait instead of the code I have added that has Thread.sleep()?

like image 254
SUM Avatar asked May 01 '12 20:05

SUM


People also ask

Which is better to use implicit wait or explicit wait?

Explicit wait is more intelligent, but can only be applied for specified elements. However, it is an improvement on implicit wait since it allows the program to pause for dynamically loaded Ajax elements. In order to declare explicit wait, one has to use “ExpectedConditions”.

Why do we use explicit wait in selenium WebDriver?

Explicit waits are used to halt the execution until the time a particular condition is met or the maximum time has elapsed. Unlike Implicit waits, Explicit waits are applied for a particular instance only.

How do you decide that we have to use implicit wait or explicit wait during waiting for the page load?

You should choose to use Explicit or Implicit Waits. WARNING: Do not mix implicit and explicit waits. Doing so can cause unpredictable wait times. For example, setting an implicit wait of 10 seconds and an explicit wait of 15 seconds, could cause a timeout to occur after 20 seconds.

Where do we use implicit wait in selenium WebDriver?

Implicit wait is used in the program when you are sure about the time taken by all web-elements on the web-page to load/visible and for certain Web-elements which you find time as one the varying factor in it's loading then you can use explicit wait.


1 Answers

TL;DR: Always use explicit wait. Forget that implicit wait exists.


Here is a quick rundown on the differences between explicit and implicit wait:

Explicit wait:

  • documented and defined behaviour.
  • runs in the local part of selenium (in the language of your code).
  • works on any condition you can think of.
  • returns either success or timeout error.
  • can define absence of element as success condition.
  • can customize delay between retries and exceptions to ignore.

Implicit wait:

  • undocumented and practically undefined behaviour.
  • runs in the remote part of selenium (the part controlling the browser).
  • only works on find element(s) methods.
  • returns either element found or (after timeout) not found.
  • if checking for absence of element must always wait until timeout.
  • cannot be customized other than global timeout.

Code examples with explanation. First implicit wait:

WebDriver driver = new FirefoxDriver(); driver.manage().timeouts().implicitlyWait(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS); driver.get("http://somedomain/url_that_delays_loading"); WebElement myDynamicElement = driver.findElement(By.id("myDynamicElement")); 

Now explicit wait:

WebDriver driver = new FirefoxDriver(); driver.get("http://somedomain/url_that_delays_loading"); WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, 10); WebElement myDynamicElement = wait.until(   ExpectedConditions.presenceOfElementLocated(By.id("myDynamicElement"))); 

Both code examples do the same thing. Find a certain element and give up if not found after 10 seconds. The implicit wait can do only this. It can only try to find an element with a timeout. The strength of explicit wait is that it can wait for all kinds of conditions. Also customize timeout and ignore certain exceptions.

Example of possible conditions: elementToBeClickable, numberOfElementsToBeMoreThan or invisibilityOf. Here is a list of the built in expected conditions: https://seleniumhq.github.io/selenium/docs/api/java/org/openqa/selenium/support/ui/ExpectedConditions.html

More explanations:

The implicit wait timeout has effect only on findElement* methods. If set then all findElement* will "wait" for the set time before declaring that the element cannot be found.

How a findElement* will wait is not defined. It depends on browser or operating system or version of selenium. Possible implementations are:

  • repeatedly try to find element until timeout. return as soon as element is found.
  • try to find element. wait until timeout. try again.
  • wait until timeout. try to find element.

This list is gathered from observations and reading bug reports and cursory reading of selenium source code.


My conclusion: Implicit wait is bad. The capabilities are limited. The behaviour is undocumented and implementation dependent.

Explicit wait can do everything implicit wait can and more. The only disadvantage of explicit wait is a bit more verbose code. But that verbosity makes the code explicit. And explicit is better that implicit. Right?


Further reading:

  • Official documentation (does not really explain the problematic other than warning from mixing implicit and explicit wait).
  • Answer on a related question from Jim Evans. Jim Evans is a maintainer of selenium. Summary: don't mix implicit and explicit wait.
  • Two blog posts explaining implicit and explicit wait in great detail:
    • http://vnrtech.blogspot.de/2013/04/selenium-implicit-wait.html
    • http://vnrtech.blogspot.de/2013/04/selenium-explicit-wait.html
  • Selected bugs about implicit and explicit wait in selenium:
    • http://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=2934
    • http://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=4471
    • http://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=7972
  • Code
    • explicit wait
    • implicit wait
  • What Happens When We Mix Implicit Wait And Explicit Wait
  • How to create custom expected conditions in Selenium
like image 167
Lesmana Avatar answered Sep 28 '22 08:09

Lesmana