Menu
The difference between tags and branches are that a branch always points to the top of a development line and will change when a new commit is pushed whereas a tag will not change. Thus tags are more useful to "tag" a specific version and the tag will then always stay on that version and usually not be changed.
<input type="range"> <input type="search"> <input type="tel"> <input type="text">
Labels carry information, and they may be created specifically for that type of surface. We sort of like these. Tags are labels without adhesive. They're attached by other means, such as tying or hanging.
Tags and branch are completely unrelated, since tags refer to a specific commit, and branch is a moving reference to the last commit of a history. Branches go, tags stay. So when you tag a commit, git doesn't care which commit or branch is checked out, if you provide him the SHA1 of what you want to tag.
A label in TFS is a way of tagging a collection of files. The label contains a bunch of files and the version of the file. It is a very low cost way of marking which versions of files make up a build etc.
A branch can be thought of as a copy of the files (of a certain version) in a different directory in TFS (with TFS knowing that this is a branch and will remember what files and versions it was a branch of).
As Eric Sink says, a branch is like a puppy. It takes some care and feeding.
Personally, I label often but branch rarely. I create a label for every build, but only branch when I know that I need to work on a historical version or that I need to work in isolation from the main line of code. You can create a branch from any point in time (and also a label) so that works well and means that we don't have branches lying around that are not being used.
Hope that helps,
Martin.
In any VCS, one usually tags when you want a snapshot of the code, to be kept as reference for the future. You branch when you want to develop a new feature, without disturbing the current code.
Andrew claims that labeling is lazier than branching; it's actually more efficient in most cases, not lazy. Labeling can allow users to grab a project at any point in time, keep a history of files changed for a version or build, and branch off of/work with the code at any point and later merge back into the main branch. Instead of what Andrew said, you're advised to only branch when more than one set of binaries is desired- when QC and Dev development are going on simultaneously or when you need to apply a hotfix to an old version, for example.
I always see labels as the lazy man's branch. If you are going to do something so significant that it requires a full-source label then it is probably best to denote this with a branch so that all tasks associated with that effort are in an organized place with only the effected code.
Branching is very powerful however and something worth learning about. TFS is not the best source control but it is not the worst either. TFS does support the concept of a trunk from which all branches sprout as well.
I would recommend this as a good place to read up on best practices - at least as far as TFS is concerned.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With