I'm in the sort of rapid prototyping phase of my React/javascript learning experience. I was wondering when folks would reach for a framework such as Next.js or Gatsby.js vs the standard Create React App.
I really dig the page based structuring and prospect for preloading links of Next.js. However, I'm not sure when you would reach for Next as apposed to CRA or even ejected CRA.
Thanks!
Gatsby and Create React App even share nearly identical webpack and Babel configurations which makes porting less cumbersome. React's own docs run on Gatsby, and React even recommends Gatsby to users of Create React App!
The correct comparison is Next JS vs Create React App (CRA). Create React App (CRA) is a de facto way to bootstrap new React applications. However, Create React App gives plain vanilla React setup with minimal functionality. Whereas Next JS provides much more out of the box.
React is a library that is meant to provide a certain set of core functionality for developers to leverage. It is intended to be lightweight and broadly applicable. Gatsby, on the other hand, is a static progressive web app (PWA) generator that offers code and data splitting out of the box.
Next JS offers server-side rendering (SSR), whereas Create React App offers client-side rendering, improving the application performance. Next. js is a framework, used to build UI and pages for the web app with React library, while React. js as a library is a part of a framework, the UI components part.
I am in the same boat. I started with CRA to create a SPA which was great to start with and get over the learning curve. But I soon realized two important issues :
Create-React-App : A really good bootstrapper tool to get started with to create a SPA.
Gatsby/React-Static : Similar to Create-React-App but produces HTML build output instead thus "pre-rendering". I am yet to experiment with this. I am hopeful that this would resolve (1) and (2) since I can now have different OGP tags already in the HTML being served from a static site server (S3/Azure Blobs/Github Pages) instead of them being changed locally after the fetch. I am not sure if this will work yet. The added advantage here is, since Gatsby already pre-renders during build time, the user experiences better performance. (May be someone experienced with Gatsby can clarify, or I will edit this answer after I am done.) Update (2/19/2018) : I can confirm that (1) is solved by Gatsby.js while still hosted as a static website.
Next.js : If Gatsby doesn't solve (1) and (2), Next.js will be my fall back to create a full blown SSR app. The issue here is, now I am going to have to use PaaS to host the site (e.g. Azure Web Apps or AWS ElasticBeanStalk or Heroku) instead of a static site hosting service (Azure Blob, AWS S3, Github Pages). This will be slightly costlier and bit more work to setup CI/CD pipelines.
Also see these alternatives listed on CRA's docs.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With