Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

When should I use std::any

Tags:

Since C++17 std::any is introduced. One can now write code like this

#include <iostream> #include <any> #include <string>  int main () {     const double d = 1.2;     std::any var = d;     const std::string str = "Hello World";     var = str; } 

A double is assigned to the variable var and than a std::string was assigned to it.

Why has std::any been introduced?

I think this is violating the least astonishment rule, because I find it hard to think of a situation, where this can be used to express more clearly, what I like to express.

Can somebody give me a good example, when std::any is beneficial.

https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/-kepOD

like image 481
schorsch312 Avatar asked Oct 09 '18 07:10

schorsch312


People also ask

What is the purpose of std :: any?

std::any Class in C++ any is one of the newest features of C++17 that provides a type-safe container to store single value of any type. In layman's terms, it is a container which allows one to store any value in it without worrying about the type safety.

Does STD any allocate?

std::any uses Small Buffer Optimization, so it will not dynamically allocate memory for simple types like ints, doubles… but for larger types it will use extra new . std::any might be considered 'heavy', but offers a lot of flexibility and type-safety.

Why do we need std :: string?

std::string class in C++ C++ has in its definition a way to represent a sequence of characters as an object of the class. This class is called std:: string. String class stores the characters as a sequence of bytes with the functionality of allowing access to the single-byte character.

Is std :: string safe?

std::string - the C++ String Class. C++ provides a simple, safe alternative to using char*s to handle strings. The C++ string class, part of the std namespace, allows you to manipulate strings safely.


2 Answers

When to Use
void* as an extremely unsafe pattern with some limited use cases, std::any adds type-safety, and that’s why it has some real use cases.

Some possibilities:

  • In Libraries - when a library type has to hold or pass anything without knowing the set of available types.
  • Parsing files - if you really cannot specify what are the supported types.
  • Message passing.
  • Bindings with a scripting language.
  • Implementing an interpreter for a scripting language
  • User Interface - controls might hold anything
  • Entities in an editor
    (ref)
like image 61
Mayur Avatar answered Oct 27 '22 09:10

Mayur


I would summarize it as classic "use when you cannot avoid it".

I can only think of non-performance-critical implementations of dynamically typed scripting languages to represent variables from the scripting world, but even that with a stretch (Boost.Spirit/example/qi/compiler_tutorial does it without, for both the parser and the runtime).

For everything else from parsers (e.g. Boost.Spirit.X3) to library APIs (e.g. ASIO) there would usually be a faster/better/more-specific alternative, as very few things are really "anything", most are more specific than that.

  • std::variant and/or std::optional for "almost any value"
  • std::packaged_task / std::function + lambdas for "callback with arguments", which would be a case of void* in C APIs.
  • etc.

Specifically, I wouldn't blindly plug it as a replacement for a void*, as it may allocate memory on the heap, which can be deadly for high performance code.

like image 25
bobah Avatar answered Oct 27 '22 11:10

bobah