Is there more beyond advance takes negative numbers?
Use std::advance. It is just as efficient (it uses iterator traits to just do iterator addition for random access iterators), and is more general in that it works on other kinds of iterators as well.
std::advanceAdvances the iterator it by n element positions. If it is a random-access iterator, the function uses just once operator+ or operator- . Otherwise, the function uses repeatedly the increase or decrease operator ( operator++ or operator-- ) until n elements have been advanced.
std::next returns an iterator pointing to the element after being advanced by certain no. of positions. It is defined inside the header file . It does not modify its arguments and returns a copy of the argument advanced by the specified amount.
std::advance
std::next
Perhaps the biggest practical difference is that std::next()
is only available from C++11.
std::next()
will advance by one by default, whereas std::advance()
requires a distance.
And then there are the return values:
std::advance()
: (none) (the iterator passed in is modified)std::next()
: The n th successor.std::next()
takes negative numbers just like std::advance
, and in that case requires that the iterator must be bidirectional. std::prev()
would be more readable when the intent is specifically to move backwards.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With