Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

What's the closest thing to Haskell GADTs and typeclasses in F#?

Tags:

f#

typeclass

gadt

F# is an ML with OOP. What's the closest it comes to Haskell generalized algebraic data types and typeclasses?

like image 526
mcandre Avatar asked Nov 09 '12 15:11

mcandre


2 Answers

The answer depends on what problem are you trying to solve. F# does not have typeclasses and GADTs, so there is no direct mapping. However, F# has various mechanisms that you would use to solve problems that you typically solve in Haskell using GADTs and typeclasses:

  • If you want to represent object structures and be able to add new concrete implementations with different behaviour, then you can often use standard OO and interfaces.

  • If you want to write generic numeric code, you can use static member constraints (here is an example), which is probably technically the closest mechanism to type classes.

  • If you want to write more advanced generic code (like universal printer or parser) then you can often use the powerful F# runtime reflection capabilities.

  • If you need to parameterize code by a set of functions (that perform various sub-operations required by the code) then you can pass around an implementation of an interface as @pad shows.

There is also a way to emulate Haskell type classes in F#, but this is usually not an idiomatic F# solution, because the F# programming style differs from the Haskell style in a number of ways. One fairly standard use of this is defining overloaded operators though (see this SO answer).

At the meta-level, asking what is an equivalent to a feature X in aother language often leads to a confused discussion, because X might be used to solve problems A, B, C in one language while another language may provide different features to solve the same problems (or some of the problems may not exist at all).

like image 86
Tomas Petricek Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 23:10

Tomas Petricek


In F#, you often use interfaces and inheritance for these purposes.

For examples' sake, here is a simple typeclass using interfaces and object expressions:

/// Typeclass
type MathOps<'T> =
    abstract member Add : 'T -> 'T -> 'T
    abstract member Mul : 'T -> 'T -> 'T

/// An instance for int
let mathInt = 
    { new MathOps<int> with
       member __.Add x y = x + y
       member __.Mul x y = x * y }

/// An instance for float
let mathFloat = 
    { new MathOps<float> with
       member __.Add x y = x + y
       member __.Mul x y = x * y }

let XtimesYplusZ (ops: MathOps<'T>) x y z =
    ops.Add (ops.Mul x y) z

printfn "%d" (XtimesYplusZ mathInt 3 4 1)
printfn "%f" (XtimesYplusZ mathFloat 3.0 4.0 1.0)

It may not look very beautiful, but it's F#-ish way to do it. For a more Haskell-like solution which uses a dictionary-of-operations, you can have a look at this nice answer.

like image 20
pad Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 21:10

pad