What triggers a gen2 garbage collection?

Question

I have an odd situation I am trying to figure out.

The Genesis:

I am running my program on a physical machine with 16 cores and 128GB of RAM. I am trying to determine why it is not using all available cores, typically it uses 20-25% CPU on average (so 4-5 cores of the 16). When I look at performance counters they show on the order of 60-70% Time in Garbage Collection.

For reference, I am using .NET Framework 4 and the TPL (Parallel.ForEach) to thread the performance-intensive portion of my program. I am limiting the number of threads to the number of cores.

The Problem:

I was creating a large number of objects, far too many for the garbage collector to handle efficiently and thus it spent a large amount of time in the garbage collector.

The Simple Solution thus far:

I am introducing object pooling to reduce the pressure on the garbage collector. I will continue pooling objects to improve performance, already pooling some objects reduced garbage collection from 60-70% of time to 45% of time and my program ran 40% faster.

The Nagging Question (the one I hope you will answer for me):

My program when running uses at most 14GB of the available RAM, compared to 128GB of RAM this is quite small. Nothing else is running on this machine (it is purely a testbed for me) and there is plenty of RAM available.

• If there is plenty of RAM available, why are any gen2 (or full) collections occurring at all? A fairly large number of these gen2 collections (in the thousands) are occurring. i.e. how is it determining the threshold to start a gen2 collection?
• Why doesn't the garbage collector simply delay any full collections until pressure on physical RAM reaches a higher threshold?
• Is there any way I can configure the garbage collector to wait for a higher threshold? (i.e. not bother collecting at all if no necessary)

EDIT:

I am already using the option to use the server garbage collector ... what I need to know is what is triggering a gen2 collection, not that the server garbage collector is better (I already know that).

Answer 1

As I recall, the Client GC is the default. My experience with it is that it doesn't let the heap get very large before collecting. For my heavy duty processing applications, I use the "server" GC.

You enable the server GC in your application configuration file:

<?xml version ="1.0"?> <configuration>   <runtime>     <gcServer enabled="true"/>   </runtime> </configuration> 

That makes a huge difference in performance for me. For example, one of my programs was spending upwards of 80% of its time in garbage collection. Enabling the server GC dropped that to just a little over 10%. Memory usage went up because the GC let it go, but that's fine for most of my applications.

Another thing that will cause a Gen 2 collection is the Large Object Heap. See CLR Inside Out: Large Object Heap Uncovered. In a nutshell, if you exceed the LOH threshold, it will trigger a Gen 2 collection. If you're allocating a lot of short-lived large objects (about 85 kilobytes), this will be a problem.