What license should I choose from codeplex for my open source project? [closed]

Question

What license should I pick on codeplex if I want an open source project? What are the pros and cons on all licenses?

Answer 1

If you want to ensure that anyone who modifies your program or builds on top of your program (by linking to it) should share their changes in the same way that you share yours, you should choose the GPL.

If you want to ensure that anyone who modifies your library share their changes, but allow people to dynamically link to it from a proprietary application, in which they don't share the source with you under the terms you shared it with them, you should choose the LGPL.

If you want to allow anyone to use your code as they wish, with no significant restrictions other than providing you credit, you should use the MIT (also known as X11) license. It is short, simple, easy to understand, and permissive.

If you need to integrate with an existing project that already has a license, you should probably just use the same license. Having everything in one project under the same license makes life a lot easier for anyone who wants to use it. But if you're creating a new project, I would recommend one of the three licenses listed above, since they are widely used, well known so people know exactly what you mean when you mention them, and will make it easier to integrate your code with existing projects. There are lots of other licenses to choose from, but in general, they just make things more complicated and difficult (because they are less well known, because of license incompatibilities, etc) without improving on one of the licenses listed above.

Answer 2

It depends very much on what you want. I'll summarize very briefly, but I recommend reading more in depth on various licenses.

• GPL: great if you want to share code but you couldn't sleep at night if someone put your code into a commercial product. Con: tons of legal stuff that's almost impossible to comprehend.
• BSD/ISC/MIT: very minimal license that only retains copyright attribution. Maybe be used is commercial products. Can be understood by common people. Cons: if you care if Apple takes your code then it's not for you (webkit in safari, freebsd userland in OSX).
• Apache/Mozilla: kind of like GPL, but also protects the brand name. Cons: you can't tweak and still call it by the name you got it.
• Lots of variations on the above. Cons: nobody knows just what the license means.