If you have a property in your public interface like the following
@interface MyClass : NSObject
@property(strong) NSString *myProp;
@end
And then synthesize it, in effect synthesizing the variable:
@implementation MyClass
@synthesize myProp = _myProp; // or just leave it at the default name..
@end
What is the visibility of the instance variable _myProp
? That is, is this considered @public
, @protected
or @private
? I'm guessing since MySubClass
could inherit from MyClass
then it would also get the properties (naturally), but would it also inherit the instance variable visibility?
What difference does it make if I put the property in a class extension? That would hide the property from subclasses, and I'm guessing the instance variable, too. Is this documented anywhere?
The instance variables are visible for all methods, constructors, and block in the class. Normally, it is recommended to make these variables private (access level). However, visibility for subclasses can be given for these variables with the use of access modifiers. Instance variables have default values.
The public instance variables are visible outside the class, and they can be accessed through a reference to the object to which they belong, by means of the field selection operator ``.
We say the scope of instance variables is the entire class definition. The scope refers to the section of code where a variable can be accessed. hypoteneuse is a parameter variable for testRightTriangle and can only be accessed in the method body, testRightTriangle.
Instance variables will be stored on the heap. and the object on heap ).
A synthesized ivar is completely invisible to all code that cannot see the @synthesize
line (which basically means anything outside of the .m file). It's not @protected
, it's not @private
, it's simply unknown. With a @private
ivar, other code trying to access it will be told that it's private, but with a synthesized ivar, other code trying to access it will be told that the field simply doesn't exist.
As a thought experiment, try imagining a situation where the ivar acted like it was @protected
. You make a subclass, and you muck about with the ivar there. Now you go back to the superclass and change @synthesize myProp
to @synthesize myProp=foo
. What happens in the subclass? When the compiler processes the subclass, it cannot see the @synthesize
line, so it would have no idea that you just changed the name of the ivar. In fact, it cannot even tell if the property is backed by an ivar at all, or if it's implemented with custom-written accessor methods. I hope it's obvious why this means that the subclass cannot possibly access the ivar, and neither can any other class.
That said, I'm not quite sure what the compiler does if you write code in the same .m file that tries to access the ivar. I expect it will treat the ivar as @private
(since the compiler can, in fact, see that the ivar exists).
Also, none of this has any bearing on the runtime methods. Other classes can still use the obj-c runtime methods to dynamically look up your class's ivar list and muck about with it.
If it is declared in your interface it is virtually public when using the @property
declarative. If you want to use @property
declaratives and keep them property truly private, you should create a private category in your implementation.
MyClass.h
@interface MyClass : NSObject {
@private
NSObject* foo;
}
@end
MyClass.m
#import "ClassWithPrivateProperty.h"
@interface MyClass ()
@property (nonatomic,retain) NSObject* foo;
@end
@implementation MyClass
@synthesize foo;
// class implementation...
@end
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With