I am confused in clearing my concepts regarding these three questions
why do we need a secondary program loader ?
in which memory it gets loaded and relocated ?
what is the difference between system internal memory and RAM ?
as far as I understand via reading links is .. SPL is required when the system internal memory can not hold the uboot completely so we need to initialize memory using a minimal piece of code called SPL. Does SPL actually relocate or it is only uboot which relocates itself?
One of the primary reasons for implementing SPL is to ensure a uniform approach to the labeling of content. With the use of a structured format, improvements can be made to the entire manufacturing and labeling process by health authorities and industries.
The page discuses the U-Boot Secondary Program Loader (SPL), a generic implementation included in the U-Boot code that can be used to replace the Xilinx First Stage Boot Loader.
Das U-Boot (subtitled "the Universal Boot Loader" and often shortened to U-Boot; see History for more about the name) is an open-source, primary boot loader used in embedded devices to package the instructions to boot the device's operating system kernel.
"MLO" is the second-stage bootloader. The second-stage bootloader can apparently be one of either the X-loader or SPL. This bootloader apparently also just reads the first partition of the SD card, and loads a file called "u-boot. bin", and executes it.
Let me explain it using OMAP platform as an example (just to provide some actual background rather than just theory or common knowledge). Take a look at some facts for starters:
So this first-stage bootloader is U-Boot SPL; and second-stage bootloader is regular U-Boot (or U-Boot proper). To be clear: SPL stands for Secondary Program Loader. Which means that ROM code is the first thing that loads (and executes) other program, and SPL is the second thing that loads (and executes) other program. So usually boot sequence is next: ROM code -> SPL -> u-boot -> kernel. And actually it's very similar to PC boot, which is: BIOS -> MBR -> GRUB -> kernel.
UPDATE
To make things absolutely clear, here is the table describing all stages of boot sequence (to clarify possible uncertainty in terminology used):
+--------+----------------+----------------+----------+ | Boot | Terminology #1 | Terminology #2 | Actual | | stage | | | program | | number | | | name | +--------+----------------+----------------+----------+ | 1 | Primary | - | ROM code | | | Program | | | | | Loader | | | | | | | | | 2 | Secondary | 1st stage | u-boot | | | Program | bootloader | SPL | | | Loader (SPL) | | | | | | | | | 3 | - | 2nd stage | u-boot | | | | bootloader | | | | | | | | 4 | - | - | kernel | | | | | | +--------+----------------+----------------+----------+
So I'm just using bootloader as synonym for U-Boot, and Program Loader as common term for any program that loads other program.
See also:
[1] SPL (at Wikipedia)
[2] TPL: SPL loading SPL - Denx
[3] Bootloader (at OSDev Wiki)
[4] Boot ROM vs Bootloader
There is no theoretical need for a Secondary Program Loader (SPL). However, there are often pragmatic reasons for having one. Two off the top of my head.
The primary loader does whatever is necessary to load the full boot process (SPL). The primary loader, for example, may be stored in ROM with memory limitations.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With