Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

What is the special case with the foreach loop that eliminates bounds checking?

What is the special case with the foreach/for loop that eliminates bounds checking? Also which bounds checking is it?

like image 561
Joan Venge Avatar asked Mar 10 '09 16:03

Joan Venge


People also ask

What is bounds checking in Java?

As a Java program is running, each time an array index is used it is checked to be sure that it is OK. This is called bounds checking, and is extremely important for catching errors.

What does array bounds checking mean?

Answer and Explanation: (a) Array bound checking is required to verify if an array element is inserted or retrieved from the bounds of the array. It is also termed as range checking or index checking. If it can not be managed properly the program may lead to an abnormal result.

Does rust do bounds checking?

In other words, since the question is about "safety features", Rust does require run-time bounds checking in safe code, unless the compiler is able to predict the result.

What is the use of foreach loop explain with example?

The foreach loop in C# iterates items in a collection, like an array or a list. It proves useful for traversing through each element in the collection and displaying them. The foreach loop is an easier and more readable alternative to for loop.


3 Answers

The standard

for(int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++) {
    ...
}

loop is the one that allows the JIT to safely remove array bounds checks (whether the index is within [0..length-1])

The foreach loop over arrays is equivalent to that standard for loop over arrays.

EDIT: As Robert Jeppesen points out:

This will be optimized if the array is local. If the array is accessible from other locations, bounds checking will still be performed. Reference: Array Bounds Check Elimination in the CLR

Thanks! Didn't know that myself.

like image 84
Christian Klauser Avatar answered Nov 13 '22 14:11

Christian Klauser


SealedSun is right. Don't optimize the way you would in C++. JIT is quite smart to do the right thing for you. You can always code the loop in different ways and then inspect the IL code.

        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int[] array = new int[100];
00000000  push        edi  
00000001  push        esi  
00000002  push        eax  
00000003  xor         eax,eax 
00000005  mov         dword ptr [esp],eax 
00000008  mov         edx,64h 
0000000d  mov         ecx,79174292h 
00000012  call        49E73198 
00000017  mov         esi,eax 
            int sum = 0;
00000019  xor         edx,edx 
0000001b  mov         dword ptr [esp],edx 
            for(int index = 0; index < array.Length; index++)
0000001e  mov         edi,dword ptr [esi+4] 
00000021  test        edi,edi 
00000023  jle         00000033 
            {
                sum += array[index];
00000025  mov         eax,dword ptr [esi+edx*4+8] 
00000029  add         dword ptr [esp],eax 
            for(int index = 0; index < array.Length; index++)
0000002c  add         edx,1 
0000002f  cmp         edi,edx 
00000031  jg          00000025 
            }

            Console.WriteLine(sum.ToString());
00000033  mov         esi,dword ptr [esp] 
00000036  call        493765F8 
0000003b  push        eax  
0000003c  mov         ecx,esi 
0000003e  xor         edx,edx 
00000040  call        49E83A8B 
00000045  mov         edi,eax 
00000047  mov         edx,88h 
0000004c  mov         ecx,1 
00000051  call        49E731B0 
00000056  mov         esi,eax 
00000058  cmp         dword ptr [esi+70h],0 
0000005c  jne         00000068 
0000005e  mov         ecx,1 
00000063  call        4936344C 
00000068  mov         ecx,dword ptr [esi+70h] 
0000006b  mov         edx,edi 
0000006d  mov         eax,dword ptr [ecx] 
0000006f  call        dword ptr [eax+000000D8h] 
00000075  pop         ecx  
        }
00000076  pop         esi  
00000077  pop         edi  
00000078  ret              

Now if optimize the code the way you would in C++ you get the following:

        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int[] array = new int[100];
00000000  push        edi  
00000001  push        esi  
00000002  push        ebx  
00000003  push        eax  
00000004  xor         eax,eax 
00000006  mov         dword ptr [esp],eax 
00000009  mov         edx,64h 
0000000e  mov         ecx,79174292h 
00000013  call        49E73198 
00000018  mov         esi,eax 
            int sum = 0;
0000001a  xor         edx,edx 
0000001c  mov         dword ptr [esp],edx 

            int length = array.Length;
0000001f  mov         ebx,dword ptr [esi+4] 
            for (int index = 0; index < length; index++)
00000022  test        ebx,ebx 
00000024  jle         0000003B 
00000026  mov         edi,dword ptr [esi+4] 
            {
                sum += array[index];
00000029  cmp         edx,edi                  <-- HERE
0000002b  jae         00000082                 <-- HERE
0000002d  mov         eax,dword ptr [esi+edx*4+8] 
00000031  add         dword ptr [esp],eax 
            for (int index = 0; index < length; index++)
00000034  add         edx,1 
00000037  cmp         edx,ebx 
00000039  jl          00000029 
            }

            Console.WriteLine(sum.ToString());
0000003b  mov         esi,dword ptr [esp] 
0000003e  call        493765F8 
00000043  push        eax  
00000044  mov         ecx,esi 
00000046  xor         edx,edx 
00000048  call        49E83A8B 
0000004d  mov         edi,eax 
0000004f  mov         edx,88h 
00000054  mov         ecx,1 
00000059  call        49E731B0 
0000005e  mov         esi,eax 
00000060  cmp         dword ptr [esi+70h],0 
00000064  jne         00000070 
00000066  mov         ecx,1 
0000006b  call        4936344C 
00000070  mov         ecx,dword ptr [esi+70h] 
00000073  mov         edx,edi 
00000075  mov         eax,dword ptr [ecx] 
00000077  call        dword ptr [eax+000000D8h] 
0000007d  pop         ecx  
        }
0000007e  pop         ebx  
0000007f  pop         esi  
00000080  pop         edi  
00000081  ret              
00000082  call        4A12746B 
00000087  int         3    

By the way - here is the same with foreach statement:

        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int[] array = new int[100];
00000000  push        edi  
00000001  push        esi  
00000002  push        eax  
00000003  xor         eax,eax 
00000005  mov         dword ptr [esp],eax 
00000008  mov         edx,64h 
0000000d  mov         ecx,79174292h 
00000012  call        49E73198 
00000017  mov         esi,eax 
            int sum = 0;
00000019  xor         edx,edx 
0000001b  mov         dword ptr [esp],edx 
            for(int index = 0; index < array.Length; index++)
0000001e  mov         edi,dword ptr [esi+4] 
00000021  test        edi,edi 
00000023  jle         00000033 
            {
                sum += array[index];
00000025  mov         eax,dword ptr [esi+edx*4+8] 
00000029  add         dword ptr [esp],eax 
            for(int index = 0; index < array.Length; index++)
0000002c  add         edx,1 
0000002f  cmp         edi,edx 
00000031  jg          00000025 
            }

            Console.WriteLine(sum.ToString());
00000033  mov         esi,dword ptr [esp] 
00000036  call        493765F8 
0000003b  push        eax  
0000003c  mov         ecx,esi 
0000003e  xor         edx,edx 
00000040  call        49E83A8B 
00000045  mov         edi,eax 
00000047  mov         edx,88h 
0000004c  mov         ecx,1 
00000051  call        49E731B0 
00000056  mov         esi,eax 
00000058  cmp         dword ptr [esi+70h],0 
0000005c  jne         00000068 
0000005e  mov         ecx,1 
00000063  call        4936344C 
00000068  mov         ecx,dword ptr [esi+70h] 
0000006b  mov         edx,edi 
0000006d  mov         eax,dword ptr [ecx] 
0000006f  call        dword ptr [eax+000000D8h] 
00000075  pop         ecx  
        }
00000076  pop         esi  
00000077  pop         edi  
00000078  ret              

Don't try to optimize your code without numbers. As you can see JIT will do a lot for your if you don't stand in its way. Use profiler before you optimize. ALWAYS.

like image 29
David Pokluda Avatar answered Nov 13 '22 14:11

David Pokluda


See this for details:

http://codebetter.com/blogs/david.hayden/archive/2005/02/27/56104.aspx

Basically, if you have a for loop, and you explicitly refer to IList.Count or Array.Length, the JIT will catch that, and skip the bounds checking. It makes it faster than precomputing the list length.

foreach on a list or array will do the same thing internally, I believe.

like image 25
Reed Copsey Avatar answered Nov 13 '22 14:11

Reed Copsey