The only difference I could think of for the question is that in the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) I need to find a minimum permutation of all the vertices in the graph and in Shortest Paths problem there is no need to consider all the vertices we can search the states space for minimum path length routes can anyone suggest more differences.
The TSP requires one to find the simple cycle covering every node in the graph with the smallest weight (alternatively, the Hamilton cycle with the least weight). The Shortest Path problem requires one to find the path between two given nodes with the smallest weight.
Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) : Given a set of cities and distances between every pair of cities, the problem is to find the shortest possible route that visits every city exactly once and returns to the starting point.
Shortest distance is a number, shortest path is a list of vertices.
The Hamiltonian Cycle Problem (HCP) and Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) are long-standing and well-known NP-hard problems. The HCP is concerned with finding paths through a given graph such that those paths visit each node exactly once after the start, and end where they began (i.e., Hamiltonian cycles).
You've already called out the essential difference: the TSP is to find a path that contains a permutation of every node in the graph, while in the shortest path problem, any given shortest path may, and often does, contain a proper subset of the nodes in the graph.
Other differences include:
If you are looking for a precise statement of the difference I would say you just need to replace your idea of the "permuation" with the more technical and precise term "simple cycle visiting every node in the graph", or better, "Hamilton cycle":
The TSP requires one to find the simple cycle covering every node in the graph with the smallest weight (alternatively, the Hamilton cycle with the least weight). The Shortest Path problem requires one to find the path between two given nodes with the smallest weight. Shortest paths need not be Hamiltonian, nor do they need to be cycles.
With the shortest path problem you consider paths between two nodes. With the TSP you consider paths between all node. This makes the latter much more difficult.
Consider two paths between nodes A and B. One over D the other one of C. Let the one over C be the longer path. In the Shortest Path problem this path can get immediately discarded. In the TSP it is perfectly possible that this path is part of the over all solution, because you'll have to visit C and visiting it later might be even more expensive.
Therefor you can't break down the TSP in similar but smaller sub-problems.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With