I am learning R (I started just this week), and I've been struggling with the concepts of typeof, mode, storage.mode and class. I've been searching up and down (official R documentation, StackOverflow, Google, etc.), and I haven't been able to find any clear explanation of the difference between these. (A few StackOverflow and CrossValidated answers have not really helped clear me up.) Finally (I hope), I think I understand it, and so my question is to verify if my understanding is correct.
mode vs storage.mode: mode and storage.mode are basically the same thing, except for a tiny difference in how the "single" datatype is handled.
mode vs typeof: Very similar, except for a few differences, most notably that both (typeof "integer" and "double") = (mode "numeric"); and both (typeof "special" and "builtin" = (mode "function").
class: Class is based on R's object-oriented class hierarchy. I'm having a hard time finding this graphically laid out, but the best I've been able to find is this diagram:
(If anyone can point me to a more accurate R class hierarchy, I'll replace it.)
Although the class names don't correspond exactly with the results of the R class() function, I believe the hierarchy is basically accurate. My understanding is that the "class" of an object--that is, the result of the class() function--is the root class in the hierarchy. So, for example, "Vector" is not a root class and so it never shows up as the result of the class() function. The root class might rather be "StrVector" ("character") or "BoolVector" ("logical"). In contrast, "Matrix" is itself a root class; hence, its class is "matrix".
Apparently, R supports multiple inheritance, and so some objects can have more than one class.
typeof/mode/storage.mode vs class: This is what was hardest part for me to understand. My understanding now is this: typeof/mode/storage.mode (which I will refer to henceforth simply as "mode") is basically the most complex datatype that an R object can hold as one of its values. So, for example, since matrixes, arrays and vectors can hold only one vector datatype, their mode (that is, the most complex datatype they can hold) is typically numeric, character or logical, even though their class (their position in the class hierarchy) is something completely different.
Where this gets most interesting (that is, confusing) is with objects like lists. A mode of "list" means that each value in the object can itself be a list (that is, an object that can hold diverse datatypes). Thus, regardless of if the class itself is "list", there are multiple objects (e.g. data frames) that can contain diverse values, and whose mode is therefore "list", even if their class is something else.
So, in summary, my understanding is:
typeof/mode/storage.mode (almost the same thing) is basically the most complex datatype that an R object can hold as one of its values; whereas
class is an object's object-oriented classification according to the R class hierarchy.
Is my understanding accurate? If not, could someone please give a more accurate explanation?
mode (almost the same thing) is basically the most complex datatype that an R object can hold as one of its values; whereas. class is an object's object-oriented classification according to the R class hierarchy.
'mode' is a mutually exclusive classification of objects according to their basic structure. The 'atomic' modes are numeric, complex, character ,logical, lists . 'class' is a property assigned to an object that determines how to operate with it.
The class function in R helps us to understand the type of object, for example the output of class for a data frame is integer and the typeof of the same object is list because data frames are stored as list in the memory but they are represented as a data frame.
The class() function in R is used to return the values of the class attribute of an R object.
According to the R documentation for typeof and class, the assertion about "main difference" is incorrect. class is an attribute of an object that can be assigned regardless of its internal storage mode, while "typeof determines the (R internal) type or storage mode of any object.".
3 Answers. An object has one and only one mode. 'class' is a property assigned to an object that determines how generic functions operate with it. It is not a mutually exclusive classification. If an object has no specific class assigned to it, such as a simple numeric vector, it's class is usually the same as its mode, by convention.
The class () is used to define/identify what "type" an object is from the point of view of object-oriented programming in R. So for any generic function that has an "integer" method will be used.
There is no THE R object system. The class attribute pertains to the S3 method dispatch system, but there are many others. The graph you found describes some basic data type structures in the R language but that doesn't really have anything to do with an object oriented system at all.
'mode' is a mutually exclusive classification of objects according to their basic structure. The 'atomic' modes are numeric, complex, character and logical. Recursive objects have modes such as 'list' or 'function' or a few others. An object has one and only one mode.
'class' is a property assigned to an object that determines how generic functions operate with it. It is not a mutually exclusive classification. If an object has no specific class assigned to it, such as a simple numeric vector, it's class is usually the same as its mode, by convention.
Changing the mode of an object is often called 'coercion'. The mode of an object can change without necessarily changing the class. e.g.
> x <- 1:16 > mode(x) [1] "numeric" > dim(x) <- c(4,4) > mode(x) [1] "numeric" > class(x) [1] "matrix" > is.numeric(x) [1] TRUE > mode(x) <- "character" > mode(x) [1] "character" > class(x) [1] "matrix"
However:
> x <- factor(x) > class(x) [1] "factor" > mode(x) [1] "numeric"
At this stage, even though x
has mode numeric again, its new class, factor
, inhibits it being used in arithmetic operations.
In practice, mode is not used very much, other than to define a class implicitly when no explicit class has been assigned.
I hope the following examples are helpful. In particular, have a look at the last two examples.
x <- 1L print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- 1 print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- letters print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- TRUE print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- cars print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- cars[1] print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- cars[[1]] print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- matrix(cars) print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- new.env() print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- expression(1 + 1) print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- quote(y <- 1 + 1) print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x))) x <- ls print(c(class(x), mode(x), storage.mode(x), typeof(x)))
The results are:
[1] "integer" "numeric" "integer" "integer" [1] "numeric" "numeric" "double" "double" [1] "character" "character" "character" "character" [1] "logical" "logical" "logical" "logical" [1] "data.frame" "list" "list" "list" [1] "data.frame" "list" "list" "list" [1] "numeric" "numeric" "double" "double" [1] "matrix" "list" "list" "list" [1] "environment" "environment" "environment" "environment" [1] "expression" "expression" "expression" "expression" [1] "<-" "call" "language" "language" [1] "function" "function" "function" "closure"
The last example shows you a case where typeof() != storage.mode().
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With