What is the difference between cube, rollup and groupBy operators?

Question

Question is pretty much in the title. I can't find any detailed documentation regarding the differences.

I do notice a difference because when interchanging cube and groupBy function calls, I get different results. I noticed that for the result using 'cube', I got a lot of null values on the expressions I often grouped by.

Answer 1

These are not intended to work in the same way. groupBy is simply an equivalent of the GROUP BY clause in standard SQL. In other words

table.groupBy($"foo", $"bar") 

is equivalent to:

SELECT foo, bar, [agg-expressions] FROM table GROUP BY foo, bar 

cube is equivalent to CUBE extension to GROUP BY. It takes a list of columns and applies aggregate expressions to all possible combinations of the grouping columns. Lets say you have data like this:

val df = Seq(("foo", 1L), ("foo", 2L), ("bar", 2L), ("bar", 2L)).toDF("x", "y") 

df.show  // +---+---+ // |  x|  y| // +---+---+ // |foo|  1| // |foo|  2| // |bar|  2| // |bar|  2| // +---+---+ 

and you compute cube(x, y) with count as an aggregation:

df.cube($"x", $"y").count.show  // +----+----+-----+      // |   x|   y|count| // +----+----+-----+ // |null|   1|    1|   <- count of records where y = 1 // |null|   2|    3|   <- count of records where y = 2 // | foo|null|    2|   <- count of records where x = foo // | bar|   2|    2|   <- count of records where x = bar AND y = 2 // | foo|   1|    1|   <- count of records where x = foo AND y = 1 // | foo|   2|    1|   <- count of records where x = foo AND y = 2 // |null|null|    4|   <- total count of records // | bar|null|    2|   <- count of records where x = bar // +----+----+-----+ 

A similar function to cube is rollup which computes hierarchical subtotals from left to right:

df.rollup($"x", $"y").count.show // +----+----+-----+ // |   x|   y|count| // +----+----+-----+ // | foo|null|    2|   <- count where x is fixed to foo // | bar|   2|    2|   <- count where x is fixed to bar and y is fixed to  2 // | foo|   1|    1|   ... // | foo|   2|    1|   ... // |null|null|    4|   <- count where no column is fixed // | bar|null|    2|   <- count where x is fixed to bar // +----+----+-----+ 

Just for comparison lets see the result of plain groupBy:

df.groupBy($"x", $"y").count.show  // +---+---+-----+ // |  x|  y|count| // +---+---+-----+ // |foo|  1|    1|   <- this is identical to x = foo AND y = 1 in CUBE or ROLLUP // |foo|  2|    1|   <- this is identical to x = foo AND y = 2 in CUBE or ROLLUP // |bar|  2|    2|   <- this is identical to x = bar AND y = 2 in CUBE or ROLLUP // +---+---+-----+ 

To summarize:

• When using plain GROUP BY every row is included only once in its corresponding summary.

• With GROUP BY CUBE(..) every row is included in summary of each combination of levels it represents, wildcards included. Logically, the shown above is equivalent to something like this (assuming we could use NULL placeholders):

  SELECT NULL, NULL, COUNT(*) FROM table UNION ALL SELECT x,    NULL, COUNT(*) FROM table GROUP BY x UNION ALL SELECT NULL, y,    COUNT(*) FROM table GROUP BY y UNION ALL SELECT x,    y,    COUNT(*) FROM table GROUP BY x, y 

• With GROUP BY ROLLUP(...) is similar to CUBE but works hierarchically by filling colums from left to right.

  SELECT NULL, NULL, COUNT(*) FROM table UNION ALL SELECT x,    NULL, COUNT(*) FROM table GROUP BY x UNION ALL SELECT x,    y,    COUNT(*) FROM table GROUP BY x, y 

ROLLUP and CUBE come from data warehousing extensions so if you want to get a better understanding how this works you can also check documentation of your favorite RDMBS. For example PostgreSQL introduced both in 9.5 and these are relatively well documented.