Is there any effective difference between
Content-Encoding: UTF-8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
?
Content encoding is mainly used to compress the message data without losing information about the origin media type. Note that the original media/content type is specified in the Content-Type header, and that the Content-Encoding applies to the representation, or "coded form", of the data.
Content-type: application/json; charset=utf-8 designates the content to be in JSON format, encoded in the UTF-8 character encoding. Designating the encoding is somewhat redundant for JSON, since the default (only?) encoding for JSON is UTF-8.
The Accept-Encoding request HTTP header indicates the content encoding (usually a compression algorithm) that the client can understand. The server uses content negotiation to select one of the proposals and informs the client of that choice with the Content-Encoding response header.
Brotli is a lossless data compression algorithm developed by Google. It uses a combination of the general-purpose LZ77 lossless compression algorithm, Huffman coding and 2nd order context modelling. Brotli.
Optional parameter charset
makes sense only for text-based content (Content-Types
like text/plain
, text/html
, and such). Not all messages are text.
Content-Encoding
means that the whole body has been encoded in some way (usually compressed). Typical values for this header are gzip
and deflate
. The recipient of this message should decode (e.g. ungzip) the body to get the original message.
I'm not even sure if UTF-8
makes any sense as a value for the Content-Encoding
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With