The __del__() method is a known as a destructor method in Python. It is called when all references to the object have been deleted i.e when an object is garbage collected.
__del__ is a destructor method which is called as soon as all references of the object are deleted i.e when an object is garbage collected. Syntax: def __del__(self): body of destructor . .
Python __str__() This method returns the string representation of the object. This method is called when print() or str() function is invoked on an object. This method must return the String object.
where, del = Python keyword for deleting an object. obj_name = name of the iterable objects that can be lists, tuples, dict, variables, user-defined objects, etc. Note – By referring to an item's index rather than its value, the del statement can be used to delete it from a list.
__del__
is a finalizer. It is called when an object is garbage collected which happens at some point after all references to the object have been deleted.
In a simple case this could be right after you say del x
or, if x
is a local variable, after the function ends. In particular, unless there are circular references, CPython (the standard Python implementation) will garbage collect immediately.
However, this is an implementation detail of CPython. The only required property of Python garbage collection is that it happens after all references have been deleted, so this might not necessary happen right after and might not happen at all.
Even more, variables can live for a long time for many reasons, e.g. a propagating exception or module introspection can keep variable reference count greater than 0. Also, variable can be a part of cycle of references — CPython with garbage collection turned on breaks most, but not all, such cycles, and even then only periodically.
Since you have no guarantee it's executed, one should never put the code that you need to be run into __del__()
— instead, this code belongs to finally
clause of the try
block or to a context manager in a with
statement. However, there are valid use cases for __del__
: e.g. if an object X
references Y
and also keeps a copy of Y
reference in a global cache
(cache['X -> Y'] = Y
) then it would be polite for X.__del__
to also delete the cache entry.
If you know that the destructor provides (in violation of the above guideline) a required cleanup, you might want to call it directly, since there is nothing special about it as a method: x.__del__()
. Obviously, you should only do so if you know it can be called twice. Or, as a last resort, you can redefine this method using
type(x).__del__ = my_safe_cleanup_method
I wrote up the answer for another question, though this is a more accurate question for it.
How do constructors and destructors work?
Here is a slightly opinionated answer.
Don't use __del__
. This is not C++ or a language built for destructors. The __del__
method really should be gone in Python 3.x, though I'm sure someone will find a use case that makes sense. If you need to use __del__
, be aware of the basic limitations per http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html:
__del__
is called when the garbage collector happens to be collecting the objects, not when you lose the last reference to an object and not when you execute del object
.__del__
is responsible for calling any __del__
in a superclass, though it is not clear if this is in method resolution order (MRO) or just calling each superclass.__del__
means that the garbage collector gives up on detecting and cleaning any cyclic links, such as losing the last reference to a linked list. You can get a list of the objects ignored from gc.garbage. You can sometimes use weak references to avoid the cycle altogether. This gets debated now and then: see http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2009-October/006194.html.__del__
function can cheat, saving a reference to an object, and stopping the garbage collection.__del__
are ignored.__del__
complements __new__
far more than __init__
. This gets confusing. See http://www.algorithm.co.il/blogs/programming/python-gotchas-1-del-is-not-the-opposite-of-init/ for an explanation and gotchas.__del__
is not a "well-loved" child in Python. You will notice that sys.exit() documentation does not specify if garbage is collected before exiting, and there are lots of odd issues. Calling the __del__
on globals causes odd ordering issues, e.g., http://bugs.python.org/issue5099. Should __del__
called even if the __init__
fails? See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-March/thread.html#2423 for a long thread.But, on the other hand:
__del__
means you do not forget to call a close statement. See http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2009/06/12/safely-using-destructors-in-python/ for a pro __del__
viewpoint. This is usually about freeing ctypes or some other special resource.And my pesonal reason for not liking the __del__
function.
__del__
it devolves into thirty messages of confusion.So, find a reason not to use __del__
.
The __del__
method, it will be called when the object is garbage collected. Note that it isn't necessarily guaranteed to be called though. The following code by itself won't necessarily do it:
del obj
The reason being that del
just decrements the reference count by one. If something else has a reference to the object, __del__
won't get called.
There are a few caveats to using __del__
though. Generally, they usually just aren't very useful. It sounds to me more like you want to use a close method or maybe a with statement.
See the python documentation on __del__
methods.
One other thing to note: __del__
methods can inhibit garbage collection if overused. In particular, a circular reference that has more than one object with a __del__
method won't get garbage collected. This is because the garbage collector doesn't know which one to call first. See the documentation on the gc module for more info.
The __del__
method (note spelling!) is called when your object is finally destroyed. Technically speaking (in cPython) that is when there are no more references to your object, ie when it goes out of scope.
If you want to delete your object and thus call the __del__
method use
del obj1
which will delete the object (provided there weren't any other references to it).
I suggest you write a small class like this
class T:
def __del__(self):
print "deleted"
And investigate in the python interpreter, eg
>>> a = T()
>>> del a
deleted
>>> a = T()
>>> b = a
>>> del b
>>> del a
deleted
>>> def fn():
... a = T()
... print "exiting fn"
...
>>> fn()
exiting fn
deleted
>>>
Note that jython and ironpython have different rules as to exactly when the object is deleted and __del__
is called. It isn't considered good practice to use __del__
though because of this and the fact that the object and its environment may be in an unknown state when it is called. It isn't absolutely guaranteed __del__
will be called either - the interpreter can exit in various ways without deleteting all objects.
As mentioned earlier, the __del__
functionality is somewhat unreliable. In cases where it might seem useful, consider using the __enter__
and __exit__
methods instead. This will give a behaviour similar to the with open() as f: pass
syntax used for accessing files. __enter__
is automatically called when entering the scope of with
, while __exit__
is automatically called when exiting it. See this question for more details.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With