We have a large application mainly written in SQL Server 7.0, where all database calls are to stored procedures. We are now running SQL Server 2005, which offers more T-SQL features.
After just about every SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE, the @@ROWCOUNT and @@ERROR get captured into local variables and evaluated for problems. If there is a problem the following is done:
They all don't check the rows (only when it is known) and some differ with more or less log/debug info. Also, the rows logic is somethimes split from the error logic (on updates where a concurrency field is checked in the WHERE clause, rows=0 means someone else has updated the data). However, here is a fairly generic example:
SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE SELECT @Error=@@ERROR, @Rows=@@ROWCOUNT IF @Rows!=1 OR @Error!=0 BEGIN SET @ErrorMsg='ERROR 20, ' + ISNULL(OBJECT_NAME(@@PROCID), 'unknown') + ' - unable to ???????? the ????.' IF @@TRANCOUNT >0 BEGIN ROLLBACK END SET @LogInfo=ISNULL(@LogInfo,'')+'; '+ISNULL(@ErrorMsg,'')+ + ' @YYYYY=' +dbo.FormatString(@YYYYY) +', @XXXXX=' +dbo.FormatString(@XXXXX) +', Error=' +dbo.FormatString(@Error) +', Rows=' +dbo.FormatString(@Rows) INSERT INTO MyLogTable (...,Message) VALUES (....,@LogInfo) RETURN 20 END
I am looking into replacing how we do this with the TRY-CATCH T-SQL. I've read about the TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) syntax, so don't just post some summary of that. I'm looking for any good ideas and how best to do or improve our error handling methods. It doesn't have to be Try-Catch, just any good or best practice use of T-SQL error handling.
1. Which of the following blocks are used for error handling in SQL Server? Explanation: SQL Server 2005 introduced TRY… CATCH statement which helps us to handle the errors effectively in the back end.
Option A is the correct choice. It is possible for all statements in a transaction to work and then the actual COMMIT to fail, so you keep the COMMIT inside your TRY block so that any failure of the COMMIT will be caught and you can gracefully handle this error and rollback.
SQL Server provides TRY, CATCH blocks for exception handling. We can put all T-SQL statements into a TRY BLOCK and the code for exception handling can be put into a CATCH block. We can also generate user-defined errors using a THROW block.
You should read this:
http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-I.html
I can't recommend that link highly enough. It's a bit long, but in a good way.
There's a disclaimer at the front that it was originally written for SQL Server 2000, but it covers the new try/catch error handling abilities in SQL Server 2005+ as well.
We currently use this template for any queries that we execute (you could leave out the Transaction stuff, if you don't need it in e.g. a DDL statement):
BEGIN TRANSACTION BEGIN TRY // do your SQL statements here COMMIT TRANSACTION END TRY BEGIN CATCH SELECT ERROR_NUMBER() AS ErrorNumber, ERROR_SEVERITY() AS ErrorSeverity, ERROR_STATE() AS ErrorState, ERROR_PROCEDURE() AS ErrorProcedure, ERROR_LINE() AS ErrorLine, ERROR_MESSAGE() AS ErrorMessage ROLLBACK TRANSACTION END CATCH
Of course, you could easily insert the caught exception into your error log table.
It works really well for us. You could probably even automate some of the conversion from your old stored procs to a new format using Code Generation (e.g. CodeSmith) or some custom C# code.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With