What is the AAA syntax equivalent to using Ordered() in Rhino Mocks

Question

I can't for the life of me find the proper syntax using the Fluent/AAA syntax in Rhino for validating order of operations.

I know how to do this with the old school record/playback syntax:

        MockRepository repository = new MockRepository();
        using (repository.Ordered())
        {
            // set some ordered expectations
        }

        using (repository.Playback())
        {
            // test
        }

Can anyone tell me what the equivalent to this in AAA syntax for Rhino Mocks would be. Even better if you can point me to some documentation for this.

Answer 1

Try this:

  //
  // Arrange
  //
  var mockFoo = MockRepository.GenerateMock<Foo>();
  mockFoo.GetRepository().Ordered();
  // or mockFoo.GetMockRepository().Ordered() in later versions

  var expected = ...;
  var classToTest = new ClassToTest( mockFoo );
  // 
  // Act
  //
  var actual = classToTest.BarMethod();

  //  
  // Assert
  //
  Assert.AreEqual( expected, actual );
 mockFoo.VerifyAllExpectations();

Answer 2

Here's an example with interaction testing which is what you usually want to use ordered expectations for:

// Arrange
var mockFoo = MockRepository.GenerateMock< Foo >();

using( mockFoo.GetRepository().Ordered() )
{
   mockFoo.Expect( x => x.SomeMethod() );
   mockFoo.Expect( x => x.SomeOtherMethod() );
}
mockFoo.Replay(); //this is a necessary leftover from the old days...

// Act
classToTest.BarMethod

//Assert
mockFoo.VerifyAllExpectations();

This syntax is very much Expect/Verify but as far as I know it's the only way to do it right now, and it does take advantage of some of the nice features introduced with 3.5.